700 SPS Varmint and Tactical Barrel Differences

I will add to this thread by straying a little. Remington die hards will want to hang me out but I have to tell this story. A friend of mine picked up a used Savage model 10 FPK with the fluted barrel, muzzle break, and Accu stock/trigger. It is chambered in 223. That rifle stock put 5 rounds in one ragged hole a little smaller than a dime at 100yds. I was quite impressed considering those accu stocks leave alot to be desired in my opinion.
 
... then you will know what the shorter barrel is about. That extra few inches of barrel puts a fair bit of weight at the end of a long lever. As the name tactical implies, some shooting in competition will be from the standing shooting position.

Some matches do involve position shooting. Balance can certainly be an issue in hand held shooting.

I have read that a shorter thick barrel is accurate in that it doesn't whip around as much as a longer, thinner barrel might. You loose speed with the short barrel which will only become an issue if you are shooting in the wind for group and accuracy. ie. hitting bulls at 500 metres.

A shorter thicker barrel may group better than a longer one. May. Greater variation will likely be seen from barrel to barrrel regardless of length. It would be interesting to take a number of barrels, shoot them enough to establish their grouping capabilities, then progressively shorten them and see if grouping ability increases as the barrels become shorter. This would be a very costly, time consuming experiement.

A faster bullet spends less time in the wind and is therefore less affected. Of course your bullet choice can affect this so look for one with a high ballistic coefficient. High speed plus high BC = accuracy in the wind.

Velocity and bullet performance are certainly issues when it comes to reduced wind drift. A more efficient combination will result save points.

I have the same gun and it shoots very good groups. It is less able as distance increases when the wind comes into play.

cheers

There are many factors affecting performance. The barrel lengths of two similar factory rifles are less important than how a particular rifle shoots.

scan0005.jpg


Fired in competition at 100m, kneeling, w/27" barrelled rifle.
 
I will add to this thread by straying a little. Remington die hards will want to hang me out but I have to tell this story. A friend of mine picked up a used Savage model 10 FPK with the fluted barrel, muzzle break, and Accu stock/trigger. It is chambered in 223. That rifle stock put 5 rounds in one ragged hole a little smaller than a dime at 100yds. I was quite impressed considering those accu stocks leave alot to be desired in my opinion.

And what does that have to do with the difference between two Remington rifles? I'm as much of a Savage fan as the next guy, but stay on track. - dan
 
Rem 700 SPS-T 20 inch barrel load testing.
168gr Amax over 45.1gr of Win748 OAL 2.865 - 2577fps
168gr Amax over 45.5gr of Win748 OAL 2.865 - 2657fps

Some of my other loads show the spread difference of seating depth.
 
While I can't comment on the technical difference between the 2 barrels, I will say that I have the tactical at home and both the stock and barrel are (very) noticeably thicker and heavier. The tactical model felt like a much more sturdy rifle, whereas the standard 700 sps felt like a toy in comparison.

It's a fantastic rifle and I highly recommend it.


edit: i see now that the varmint and tactical use the same barrel - I'm not sure if the stock is the same though, maybe that's the difference?
 
Back
Top Bottom