Exactly..not too many people want a longer case that burns more powder for basically the same results..regardless of how much of the action is being used.
Really, I thought the performace would drop with the shorter barrel.
Hmmm, now you have me thinking, didn't really want a 280AI as I like to be able to buy a box of shells, but I have the dies and brass for the 280AI all ready! Hmmmm!
Ok, I am as green as grass on this so if you could help me understand this. I am assuming that the .454" is the chamber size of the shoulder of the 7mm-08? If my assumption is correct then to me you should take the length of the 280 rem 2"minus the 1 3/16" for 13/16" and then subtract that from the length of the 7mm-08 1 1/4" for a set back of around 7/16" - 1/2"?
I am just trying to visualize this as when I looked at the drawings for the brass I thought this would be the problem, but then there was a thread about people chambering 308's in a 30-06 and firing them so I thought I must be mistaken.
I had thought about the 284Win as I have all the dies and brass for it but thought better of it as trying to get it to feed would likely be a problem.
Ok, I am as green as grass on this so if you could help me understand this. I am assuming that the .454" is the chamber size of the shoulder of the 7mm-08? If my assumption is correct then to me you should take the length of the 280 rem 2"minus the 1 3/16" for 13/16" and then subtract that from the length of the 7mm-08 1 1/4" for a set back of around 7/16" - 1/2"?
I am just trying to visualize this as when I looked at the drawings for the brass I thought this would be the problem, but then there was a thread about people chambering 308's in a 30-06 and firing them so I thought I must be mistaken.
I had thought about the 284Win as I have all the dies and brass for it but thought better of it as trying to get it to feed would likely be a problem.
280AI is a no-brainer...no setback required.