Again, I am only discussing the numbers given in this article as they are not reasonable numbers. These prices are not today's prices.
That's only because you don't want to compare them with wages, and the cost of everything else between the two time periods.
They're more expensive across the board than they were when that OLD article was written, but the article is still very relevant.
Maybe you weren't in the sport at the time it was written, or you were and refuse to pay new prices? Whatever, a lot of people get stuck on such things.
There are people saying they aren't saving any money because they're shooting three times as much, which is also a "personal issue" simply because it would cost them three times as much to shoot as much as they want to, if they were buying commercial off the shelf ammunition.
Handloading isn't for everyone, and if we're going to throw saving money into the equation, shooting sports are not for anyone who has rigid monetary constraints, whether self imposed or situationally imposed.
If you're on a strict budget, don't get into the shooting sports.
I hear it on a regular basis, when people state, "When my Dad/Grandfather/Uncle, etc dies, I'm going to get the rifles, handloading equipment, etc."
They usually shoot up all of the ammo, don't know or want to learn how to use the reloading equipment/components, and go to the LGS to purchase ammo, OOPS STICKER SHOCK sets in and they find out they must have a license to purchase what they want and to own their newly acquired firearms. So they either lock it all away, until they pass on to the next plane, or sell it all for whatever they can get from the circles they hang in.