9mm vs 5.56/223 opinions
- Thread starter Sudbury shooter
- Start date
I ain't knocking Holmes, I am asking whats the drop of the 9mm @ 300m cause the .223 drops a good foot.
You can also shoot the .223 at a greater distance for a challenge if 300m ain't doing it. Not everyone has that option of course(I usually don't).
Hard to even compare an AR to the sub2000. Love the sub2k. Light, tough, NR, cheap ammo, fun to shoot. All this talk about not being powerful enough; for what, cardboard and paper targets? Energy isn't a factor when the only thing you'll ever shoot with your rifle, can also be found in your recycle bin.
As far as shooting long distances goes; not many people shoot past 100 yards anyways. Most people shoot 100, the rest shoot at 50 with maybe a couple guys sitting at the 300yd bench once in awhile.
Wouldn't spend the kind of money they want for a JRC or TD, at that point you may as well shell out for a decent AR.
The sub2k has really come down in price and there always seems to be one kicking around on the EE. Sure, it is a bit 'gimmicky' and the pistol grip feels like you could crush it if you squeezed hard enough. But, since I've had mine, the more I try to abuse it, the more it seems to love me back.
As far as shooting long distances goes; not many people shoot past 100 yards anyways. Most people shoot 100, the rest shoot at 50 with maybe a couple guys sitting at the 300yd bench once in awhile.
Wouldn't spend the kind of money they want for a JRC or TD, at that point you may as well shell out for a decent AR.
The sub2k has really come down in price and there always seems to be one kicking around on the EE. Sure, it is a bit 'gimmicky' and the pistol grip feels like you could crush it if you squeezed hard enough. But, since I've had mine, the more I try to abuse it, the more it seems to love me back.
