I love how your post started out as if the customer was sitting there with his hands in his pockets to suddenly showing up with an attitude. Retail can be stressful, but there are no excuses for rudeness. I bet you would complain all over this site if you called a police station and the officer was rude to you because he was "busy", yet it's ok for an employee of a retail store? If he's too busy to talk on the phone, then put the person on hold. I would rather be told it's too busy then have a rude employee on the phone.
A retail store who treats it's customers poorly will slowly become LESS busy, then we can really judge their customer service, as they are begging for customers back.
And as for the Walmart comment, there are plenty of other full service firearms stores out there, so don't think people will NOT find another store.
out how ridiculous it is to whine about that store being messy.
One of the first retailers on CGN I dealt with was Epps.
I placed an order for several hundred dollars. There was a bunch of stuff, but the stuff that matters was 2mags for a buckmark pistol and a set of grey laminated palmswell grips for a buckmark.
I received 2mags but they were for a browning high power (one 9mm and 1 40 S&W) and the grips were for a high standard.
Their response when I called; geez that's terrible, send them back and we'll refund your money, less a re-stocking fee.
Not only was I to pay for shipping them back, but they were only going to refund 65% of the $$ I paid......
Needless to say they have been on my "don't order from" list since winter of 2009......
Sorry to hear about your experience with Epps Claven, but I'm not terribly surprised.....
Its quite clearly stated that all new firearms must be sent to manufacturers if they are defective.
I will be waiting till P&D has the firearm I wanted to order in.
This isn't a warranty issue. This is a retail sales act issue. Their policy, even if stated, doesn't trump contract law. In this case, the OP contracted for goods. He paid his money and did not receive the goods he paid for. Under contract law, he must have an opportunity to view the goods, a representative sample of the goods or be afforded the opportunity to inspect the goods to make sure they are to specification. This rifle is clearly not to specification and the transaction isn't completed until he accepts the rifle, which he clearly does not.