A Canadian collector trend?

There is ZERO credibility to any claims a rifle is a combat survivor, without some fluke of documentation. The No.4 soldiered in Canada from 1941 to the mid 1960's. Why on earth should anyone believe their No.4's dings and ouches happened in Feb 1945 in Holland, and not on the truck between the cadet's weapons lockup and the range at Camp Farnham in 1964?

Since the No4 is the rifle most often claimed to have "seen combat", or very commonly "the one used by my Grandfather", the above sums it up. The fact is that soldiers were not permitted to keep their rifle when they were discharged. I suppose a rifle could be stolen, or by chance, "the one", could be found in a barrel at Sears, but the chances are minute that it's the gun carried by him. Family folklore is easily offended, but I suggest that the phrase "like the one I carried", became "the one I carried" over time. Sorry.

As always, "buy the gun, not the story". Anyone claiming that a gun saw combat without clear proof of that, is making a claim that is dubious at best, an outright falsehood at worst.
 
The simple reality is that the military maintenance system does not keep rifles in well used condition so that we can enjoy their authenticity and patina. There are some of those rifles around, but they usually "escaped custody" somehow long ago. A No4 that marched up Italy or went from Normandy to Germany will have been through the workshops a few times since then. Such is life.
 
Back
Top Bottom