A Comparative Review of Four Precision/Tactical Bolt Rifles - with a price edit

Good review!

One thing that is always good to have in a tactical rifle reviews though, is the reliability of the magazine if its detachable. Many of them will work fine when the bolt is cycled at a "normal" speed. The issues come when it is cycled rapidly, as you would do when engaging multiple targets quickly. The falling plates portion of the NSCC PR competition comes to mind, but I've been burned a few times on the 200M rapid follow-up by a magazine malfunction.
 
Apologies for group size error. Fact remains that the targets were shot with the rifles stated so those with an interest in such things can still see the relative performances on the days in question.
 
These are exactly the kind of threads that CGN should be full of.

But noooo...its much more interesting to discuss nuclear bomb conspriacies in OT
 
Tomochan said:
Apologies for group size error. Fact remains that the targets were shot with the rifles stated so those with an interest in such things can still see the relative performances on the days in question.
Click to expand...
I hope that I didn't come off sounding rude. If I did I apologize.
 
Underthegun said:
I hope that I didn't come off sounding rude. If I did I apologize.
Click to expand...

Not to me. Accuracy is important in reviews. Just a note, if you can see 2 separate bullet holes with space in between, the group size has to be at least the size of 1 bullet, in this case at least .308.

NormB
 
There are not nearly enough threads with pictures of the groups shot. Lots of load "X", shoots 1/4" groups at 400 yards. That's GREAT! Prove it please. Show us some pictures to back up your claim. I personally LOVE to see that ####! Show me the gun and the groups shot and I am a happy camper! GREAT WRITE UP. THANKS FOR PUTTING IN THE TIME!
SRSA311
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom