A Message from Matt Hipwell

Status
Not open for further replies.
There’s still Alberta Tactical Rifles awesome court case that could use plenty of donations… let’s not let the slimy government and its newest henchmen off easy.

Most people here would be served well owning an ATRS Modern Hunter.
 
Last edited:
RyoTHC said:
There’s still Alberta Tactical Rifles awesome court case that could use plenty of donations… let’s not let the slimy government and its newest henchmen off easy.

Most people here would be served well owning an ATRS Modern Hunter.
Click to expand...

A lot of mud slinging from a dude that scalps Marlins to the same community he is so vocal for.
 
The CSAAA handing the Liberal Govt a win (cause optically that's what this is) by entering into a contract to aid them with their confiscation plan is just plain wrong. I just cannot see any good for anyone coming out of this.
The Libs will use this to every bit for their political advantage. They have no morals so they will twist this to fit their perverted narrative and convince the greater un-educated public that the firearms community is now on board with their confiscation plan
It seems clear to me the CSAAA board did not think this through thoroughly (if there was anything to think about at all in any case).
I don't support this contract.

The only dividing action here was struck by the CSAAA board members. Please do not intimate that those who support you financially by buying product from your businesses are to blame for this great divide.
My STRONG recommendation is for the CSAAA to pull out while it can or else expect all involved, including the related businesses to be substantially negatively impacted.
 
The "aggrieved" is a typical business owner. Customers are valued in dollars. Once they are no longer valuable, they are abandoned.

The typical member of this board (CGNer) values handguns, and military-like/surplus long guns. Both of which are now illegal to sell, though curiously there are a few exceptions - one in particular, the WK-180c.

You are no longer of any value to the typical CGN business sponsor. However, government is big business which is why a number of CGN business sponsors happily endorsed Bill C-21 through their participation in the CSAAA. They are now well positioned to apply for government contracts, doubtless on a preferential basis.

A couple a sponsors have been lauded as staunch supporters of the firearms community. They have testified on government committees, even though they have been sworn to secrecy. No one knows what they really said. Some laud their generous support firearms lobbying efforts, even though much of the funds were actually supplied to them by CGNers.

Bottom line is that in the eyes of most of the firearms industry, CGNers are yesterday's profits. The industry has been planning to abandon us for quite some time.
 
Vewdu said:
A lot of mud slinging from a dude that scalps Marlins to the same community he is so vocal for.
Click to expand...

Eh just because people have more money than you and can afford the things that they want, doesn’t hurt my feelings lol.

Let me guess, when you sell items you sell them BELOW market value? Because you’re such a nice guy?

Get the #### outta here with your bull####.

See all the positive reviews ? That means happy customers.

These traitors selling out the entire community for 700k and leaving us to the wolves is entirely different and if you’re too stupid to see that… well, I wouldn’t be surprised.

I’m sorry you can’t afford the price the market has dictated so you’re sour that you are stuck on a 2-3 year waiting list.
Maybe make some friends in the community and you’ll get the things you want.
 
Barring a change of government, it was inevitable that gun owners would reach the crossroads and have to decide about compliance, and some would take the buy-back.

Of course, many of us are stunned by the reluctant disclosure that CSAAA has been secretly negotiating their compliance for over a year.
A secret that only helped the Liberal spin and twist events to suit their narrative.

Anyway, enough about the CSAAA. They're assimilated.
They're history.
Seems to me that we need another voice for the industry to say what the CSAAA no longer can: the buyback is unjust and the CSAAA's actions are evidence of how desperate Canadians businesses are facing ruin from the Liberals' political theatre.
 
Steve_B said:
Barring a change of government, it was inevitable that gun owners would reach the crossroads and have to decide about compliance, and some would take the buy-back.

Of course, many of us are stunned by the reluctant disclosure that CSAAA has been secretly negotiating their compliance for over a year.
A secret that only helped the Liberal spin and twist events to suit their narrative.

Anyway, enough about the CSAAA. They're assimilated.
They're history.
Seems to me that we need another voice for the industry to say what the CSAAA no longer can: the buyback is unjust and the CSAAA's actions are evidence of how desperate Canadians businesses are facing ruin from the Liberals' political theatre.
Click to expand...

Looks like after Bill Blair left and Marco took over, the CSAAA started dating Marco eh? ..... WOW
 
We need an election now. Let’s go to the polls in the fall.

Steve_B said:
Barring a change of government, it was inevitable that gun owners would reach the crossroads and have to decide about compliance, and some would take the buy-back.

Of course, many of us are stunned by the reluctant disclosure that CSAAA has been secretly negotiating their compliance for over a year.
A secret that only helped the Liberal spin and twist events to suit their narrative.

Anyway, enough about the CSAAA. They're assimilated.
They're history.
Seems to me that we need another voice for the industry to say what the CSAAA no longer can: the buyback is unjust and the CSAAA's actions are evidence of how desperate Canadians businesses are facing ruin from the Liberals' political theatre.
Click to expand...
 
Who funds the CSAAA? Time to revoke any and all funding AND demand the board be changed entirely. Clearly not a single person that sat in that board had a set of balls… wonder how long they have been without?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom