Accuracy Node Spacing

I might be a barbarian. I pick a bullet that has a fighting chance of doing what I want when it gets there, or promises to get there in an expeditious fashion if thats the priority.
Then I find the length to lands, and load from bottom to top of the load manual one cartridge of each with a 1 grain spacing. Then walk out my shop with cartridges still in the loading block, plunk my butt down at the shooting bench, turn on the Garmin and shoot them all at the same target. This more or less just to find maximum and whether I can get the velocity with that powder, If I can swim faster I might just quit and try a different powder.
On the other hand; there is a target (130 yards, the distance from the door to the edge of my lawn) so I do watch the group form through the rifle scope and observe the point of impact as I go. Sometimes it changes midway through; but it isn’t that uncommon to stick the whole mess into an inch or a bit more. When you shoot good bullets through good barrels good things tend to happen. With maximum established wander back in the shop and load up 5 or six of them and see what I’ve got. If that bears out I’ll load about 10, then go to the benchs on the other side of the road and shoot them on steel at 600 yards. If it doesn’t bear out I can work down instead of up, are change bullets. I view that as the direct approach, rather than guess that a pile of shot up components and questionable analysis equals long range accuracy it is easier just to shoot it at the long range and know.

Target and varmint rifles are sort of done to a higher standard, but the initial stages are the same.

Like I said; barbarian. ;)
 
Being a barbarian can work well too. :)

My findings reinforce yours. I’ve done a full chrono test with one POA, and sent 15 rounds at it with charges growing by 0.2 grains (6BR and 6GT).

A Berger bullet with two different powders still grouped under an inch or so with all that variance over the 15 shots.

Doing OCW, I’ve seen similar minimal elevation changes over and over again, with the beefy IBI barrels I’m using and Bergers or Barnes MB.

With the 6GT and OCW, the groups I don’t like have up to 7/8” vertical. The groups I am using have tested at usually 1/4” vertical during OCW.

When shooting dozens of 5-shot groups, the properties of stats come into play with all those variables, including me lol! and my average group size grows to under 1/2”.

That’s why I want to compare those poorly showing OCW groups to my established current load.

Was it all just a fluke? Or is there something to this pressure/velocity thing?

The following pic is what I normally see with my current fav load and 3-shot groups, which I mostly ignore. I know these will grow when I shoot larger groups, but it is really consistent.

IMG_5908.jpeg
 
Bloke on the range has a good video about it, if you’re a believer in evolutionary psychology,
basic math.
 
Back
Top Bottom