Delayed confiscation with out compensation - is how we know we live in an elected dictatorship.
Our Charter of Rights and Freedoms grants no right to own property.
Correct. And since money is property, had they put property rights in the Charter, the government would have quickly ceased to function.
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
In determining in what can be demonstrably justified as an infringement of a right, the Supreme Court developed the Oakes test, which in short states that infringements of our rights must be carefully designed to achieve a valid purpose, must infringe the right as little as possible, and the EFFECTS of the infringement must be proportional to the objective.
Taken together, this basically means that every time government taxed a dollar from anyone, for any reason, they would be liable to a supreme court charter challenge and would have to be able to account for it, and be able to demonstrate that it wasn't pissed away on stupid idea or scandal.
Given that some people are paying marginal tax rates north of 40%, no one would call that a minimal impairment. The carefully designed purpose of income tax was to pay for the last world war, and currently has no stated purpose other than the general coffers of government, which fails to meet the carefully designed for a valid purpose portion of the test.
With property rights in the charter, it becomes very difficult for government to tax anyone for anything. Even the most libertarian government is still a government that needs tax revenue to function, and as such no government will ever put property rights in the charter.