No manufacturing in Australia. Manufacturing in Vietnam continued - they kept bringing them to shows for a bit. But getting them to actually agree on an export fizzled.Depends on condition.
I've seen excellent rifles, with the case, and spare mags sell for that much.
Very pretty, supposedly stronger than No4 actions, and more accurate.
I never found that to be the case with the rifles I had other than the L42 clone, which was very accurate, with IVI ammo it liked.
There was a lot of controversy between the manufacturers and distributors, which ended up in court. We got the leftovers here in Canada.
They went through a few socalled scandals because some folks didn't appreciate the receivers being made in Viet Nam.
I don't know if they're still manufacturing in Australia or out of business.
I remember reading a post online about 4 or 5 years ago about some guy who claims he has over 12,000 rounds through his AIA Enfield and has never had a single issue or broken part. He said it was his most accurate Enfield in his collection of 6 Lee Enfields.Aia never built anything, think Ruko, Tasco…
Arsenal 27 or Z111 factory built em and is still producing guns. You can find some threads on Reddit with pictures.
More than a few threads on here and other sites about them
Consideredand not hard use capable when the rangers needed a replacement they got evaluated by some level of government.
If you want a 308 Enfield, buy one, L39’s and other 308 Enfield’s. Calgary shooting centre brought in a least a dozen last year
I wouldn't exactly consider the ranger replacement program to be the gold standard for whether or not a firearm is hard use capable or not.Aia never built anything, think Ruko, Tasco…
Arsenal 27 or Z111 factory built em and is still producing guns. You can find some threads on Reddit with pictures.
More than a few threads on here and other sites about them
Consideredand not hard use capable when the rangers needed a replacement they got evaluated by some level of government.
If you want a 308 Enfield, buy one, L39’s and other 308 Enfield’s. Calgary shooting centre brought in a least a dozen last year
I heard that all the one's left after the serving Rangers were offered their old issue ones were sent out to be melted down by DND.The t3 was chosen for reasons other than functionality or durability.
I agree that procurement is a joke and that most issued “kit” is junk.
I’ve yet to see any pictures of failed stocks.
Wonder what happened to all the enfields they had. They could have been rebuilt, new parts could have been made.
https://ottawacitizen.com/public-service/defence-watch/stocks-c-19-rifles-canadian-rangersThe t3 was chosen for reasons other than functionality or durability.
I agree that procurement is a joke and that most issued “kit” is junk.
I’ve yet to see any pictures of failed stocks.
Wonder what happened to all the enfields they had. They could have been rebuilt, new parts could have been made.
A Tikka T3x Arctic (basically the same rifle as a C19) costs $3245 before taxes in Canada and is not scarce, while a regular Tikka T3x in .308 costs only $1099 at Cabela's Canada.the only reason an AIA enfield is listing for 3000.00 is due to scarcity and the hope that someone wants one bad enough to pay thru the nose for it.
If I'm dropping 3K on an "enfield" ...... it's not going to be some clone rifle like the AIA no matter how nice some of them might be. It's going to be a real Lee Enfield because a guy can find some real nice rifles for 3 grand or less when looking for the real thing or with that budget, restore one to near mint condition. New barrels exists as do lots of parts/stocks ect.



























