ammomart powder

[blazinbilly]

Anyone have load data for noble #48, was told it's the same as 4831 but which one IMR or Hodgson.

 

[Eagleye]

Very similar to H4831. I burned up about 14 lbs of it in the day. EE.

 

[bearhunter]

It's very close to the original #4831 surplus powder, which was a slow lot of #4350, back in the day and to avoid confusion Hodgdon started calling it #4831 or something to that effect.

The milspec #4831 was a bit faster burning than the ''new manufacture H4831"

I used to use IMR specs for the #48 Nobel and it the results were very close.

 

[blazinbilly]

Thanks everyone for the info. With the price of components these days hate to throw it out. Thanks again.

 

[vmax204]

I have always used IMR load data for ammomart powder

 

[Eagleye]

I used a fair bit of Ammomart Numbers 48 and 49. Both had similar burning rates, but
#49 was considerably bulkier than was #48, so filled the case more for any given load.
IMHO, they were both a slight bit slower than IMR 4831, but there may have been
more than one lot to work from as well. EE

 

[B-78]

Just shot the last of my 22 250 rounds that I had loaded with Ammo Mart 44 and 55gr SPSX. Found two more pounds in the cabinet and prepping brass this evening to load more. Sticker on side of container says to use 3031 data. Was using this load to exterminate gophers out to 200 yds last weekend.

 

[Eagleye]

Shot up a fair bit of #44 as well. Decent stuff, but throws a pretty interesting muzzle flash.
Especially noticeable in poor light. EE.