Win/64 et al, you are of course correct in pointing out that there were (and are) very fine guns made in Belgium. I have a couple. The fact remains that for every Dumoulin there are thousands of mediocre Belgian guns. The Belgians were in a unique position to produce large quantities of inexpensive guns, largely for the export market. To fill international demand they produced what ever they were asked to produce, and by and large that meant cheap hardware store guns. So, while I agree that the Belgians could / can produce top flight firearms, the majority of their production was aimed at the bottom end of the scale. Hence my use of the word "typical" - look it up.
The reason that I point this out is the sheer number of questions I have answered in regards to the history and desirability of someone's Grandpa's gun, which turns out to be a a $10 hardware store special (Grandpa bought the cheapest gun he could lay his hands on).
It is irresponsible to say that the Belgians produced fine shotguns without pointing out that they also produced hoards of poorly made, poorly balanced clunkers. For those who are capable of evaluating a gun on its own merits this is not required, but for those who are new to the subject a blanket endorsement of Belgian firearms can be misleading. When Win/64 says "Yes they did make their share of Clunkers" it is being rather biased - they did in fact make more than their share of clunkers. Buyer beware.
The same is true of Spain. A dozen or so top flight makers throughout history, the rest scrambling for any form of market share. I draw the line at England - someone please show me an example of an English clunker.
So, perhaps I am being unfair by using a phrase like "typical Belgian clunker" (the official term is JABC - Juast Another Belgian Clunker). There are indeed many truly well made Belgian guns. I just do not view them as "typical" any more than I view a Grulla or Arrieta as a "typical" Spanish gun.
Sharptail