I'm looking to replace the 3 position receiver extension on my MDT chassis for one with more adjustability. I've narrowed things down to a Strike industries (anodized) and Timber Creek Outdoors (cerakoted) receiver extension. As far as I'm aware the Strike industries extension is not Type 3 anodized.
I know that anodizing is typically the more durable coating for AR parts, but with this extension receiving all of its wear from the buttstock sliding over it, I'm wondering if the natural lubricity of cerakote may be the better option. I was hoping for some feedback from people who have used extensions with either coating. This rifle is going to get a lot of use so long term wear is what I'm interested in.
I know that anodizing is typically the more durable coating for AR parts, but with this extension receiving all of its wear from the buttstock sliding over it, I'm wondering if the natural lubricity of cerakote may be the better option. I was hoping for some feedback from people who have used extensions with either coating. This rifle is going to get a lot of use so long term wear is what I'm interested in.


















































