Another potential NON-Restricted .308 semi coming to Canada - Radical RMR10

trevj said:
I just gotta throw in one comment.

I find the idea that someone becoming ISO certified, being throw out as a catch-all to assure folks that they don't produce crap, to be laughable.

All they have to do is document their processes, and follow them, and be able to prove it. And pay for their Certification before they plaster their walls and advertising with it. Document producing crap, produce crap, done. Fifty grand or more down the shtter, a nice new banner, and the same old crap out the loading dock.

<sigh> bitter leftovers from spending FAR too much of my life trying to get through a badly implemented ISO-type process documentation exercise in a non-linear environment.
Click to expand...

AS > ISO.

W ISO at the very least it illustrates a commitment to process. For some companies there is no choice. All in how its executed, and what the product is. There are companies making loose tolerance parts under iso. Some make medical components. Its definately not a be all end all solution.
 
Rebel Rouser said:
Need more 5.56.
Click to expand...

BCL Badger (5.56 Non Restricted)

GAS SYSTEM: LONG STROKE PISTON

BARREL LENGTH: 11.5, 14.5, 16.75, 18.5″

CALIBER: 5.56N

LENGTH: “/”

WEIGHT: 6.9 LBS

ACCURACY: 1 MOA

CDN DESIGNATION: NON-RESTRICTED

badger.light_-1.jpg
 
jonnyboy1014 said:
BCL Badger (5.56 Non Restricted)

GAS SYSTEM: LONG STROKE PISTON

BARREL LENGTH: 11.5, 14.5, 16.75, 18.5″

CALIBER: 5.56N

LENGTH: “/”

WEIGHT: 6.9 LBS

ACCURACY: 1 MOA

CDN DESIGNATION: NON-RESTRICTED

badger.light_-1.jpg
Click to expand...

I'm very much looking forward to the badger, but 1 moa seems a bit optimistic....guess we'll have to wait and see
 
jonnyboy1014 said:
BCL Badger (5.56 Non Restricted)

GAS SYSTEM: LONG STROKE PISTON

BARREL LENGTH: 11.5, 14.5, 16.75, 18.5″

CALIBER: 5.56N

LENGTH: “/”

WEIGHT: 6.9 LBS

ACCURACY: 1 MOA

CDN DESIGNATION: NON-RESTRICTED

badger.light_-1.jpg
Click to expand...

Only Non-Restricted in the 18.5” configuration. All others are restricted which can creat some issues and confusion.
 
cr5 said:
I sure hope not. My guess would be close to 50% of BCL parts should have been trashed but of those probably 50% actually cause issues due to tolerance stacking and whatever other factors.
I can only recall maybe a couple times on this site I've heard of someone having an issue with CC products. I would guess they are up where I wish all manufacturers were and they're probably around 98% of their products are built as they should be.
Everyone makes a mistake from time to time but it almost seems like an accident when BCL makes a rifle with no issues at all.
Click to expand...
Of all the NEA and BCL flaming I've seen on CGN, this has got to be one of the stupidest things I've ever read.
 
The thing with FRT's is, they can come back with questions, including requests for testing data and drawings. If you for some reason miss the request you are put to the bottom of the queue. That's why it is super important to follow up with the lab.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom