Another Stevens 200 Story - .223 - 1/3 MOA for $600 bucks

mlehtovaara

BANNED
BANNED
BANNED
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
103   0   1
Stevens 200 - .223 rem = $360 (courtesy of Smacdonald)
Bushnell Banner 6-24 x 40mm = $170
Weaver Quadlock rings = $20
Weaver Bases = $20
Caldwell Swivel Bipod 6-9" = $40

Your first Handloads = Priceless

Anyway Grand Total = $610 (not including tax)

So just though I would put another Stevens 200 thread out there. I had heard so much about these guns and so when I finally decided to buy a rifle I said what the hell why not. I didn't think Id be shooting it much so I bought a .270 win for a deer rifle. Problem was the thing was so accurate it made me want to shoot a hell of alot more than I could afford at .270 win prices. So I sold it and bought another Stevens in .223. A quick adjustment to the trigger was all it took to get it pretty decent, and I was ready. I was overjoyed when I went out to the range for the first time and with some cheap Remington UMC 55 grain FMJ I was shooting sub moa right off the bat.

IMG00090-20100415-2054.jpg

IMG00091-20100415-2055.jpg


At this point I was using a crappy Bushnell 3-9 scope that came off a Savage 11fcxp package gun and it would serve its purpose for hunting but I needed more.

So I wnet out and bought myself a Bushnell Banner 6-24 x 40 which I had heard alot of good reviews for, and a set of weaver bases and rings, and since it is a .223 I didnt think I needed anything special. So Weaver bases, and aluminum quad lock rings were mounted and ready to go.

So here is the gun:

DSCI0116.jpg


And a closer look at the setup:

DSCI0115.jpg


So the next step was obviously to start handloading! I already reload for my handguns in 9mm, and .44 mag, and I just recently started reloading for my 30-30 Marlin so I figured what the hell. Why not.

Got myself some Lee dies with the neck sizer and thanks to some CGNers recommendations I picked up some H335, and some speer 52 grain bullets and I was off to the races. The first loads were 25 grains with a COAL of 2.265. They dont feed from the mag as they are too long but these guns seem to have a long distance to the lands.

Anyway I had 20 rounds and it took a couple shots to get zeroed. Here is the first 5 shot group:

stevens200-223-1.jpg


A couple more tweaks on the scope and now I only had a few shots left so the next couple were 3 shot groups this being the better one.

stevens200-223.jpg


So I was happy for my first handloads. They were a good starting point and I was saving 3 shots to take at the 200 yard gong for fun. I went down range to change targets and the guy I was shooting with mentioned to me that he was impressed, and I should try his rear sandbag. It would help he said. I am a total newb to this stuff, and had never used a rear bag I always just hold the butt of the gun tight to my shoulder with my other hand. So he set me up and gave me a couple tips like squeeze and release the bag to move the crosshairs. So here is what my last 3 shots of the day printed!!!!!!

bestgroupyet.jpg


Needless to say I am absolutely ecstatic. I am kicking myself in the ass now for not loading more but I will update as I go.

Now before you precision guys get all bent outta shape and start slammin me because it is only a 3 shot group let me clarify I have never shot like this before, but from what I have learned today, and on the last few weeks shooting this gun I am confident that I will soon be able to do so consistently. Seb MOA is impressive enough and with factory ammo this gun does that all day, so 1/2 MOA should be no problem and the occasional group like this is more than I bargained for.

I just wanted to throw this out there for anyone looking to start shooting some rifles, and doesnt want to spen thousands of dollars on a setup. I was almost ready to invest in a serious rig, but as a total newb I felt it was a big risk. I can have alot of fun and learn all the basics with this gun, and will never regret this purchase. I am sure later I might upgrade the barrel and stock, and even replace the trigger. For now though I am going to focus on getting some handloads cooked up and putting in some trigger time.
 
I love it! Mine shoots great too. I think the Stevens 200 is becoming the 55 Chevy of rifles, not much to look at, but a monster when modified, and cheap.
 
I <3 Stevens 200.

I have owned 3. Only 1 currently, but I am eying up a used one I found in 243.

Be a really nice deer/coyote/bush rifle.
 
the big thing i hated about my stevens m200 is how flimsy the forend of the stock feels, I epoxied a 1/4 keystock in mine to stiffen it up and it worked great
 
Don't change a thing, don't be tempted to tweak.
Nice report, thanks.

Everyone is telling me to bed the stock and stiffen the forend and such, but at this point I am not screwing with anything. I shoot off a bipod and the stock hardly flexes at all. When set up on the bipod and rear bag the barrel is still fully free floated with ample clearance. As far as bedding the stock goes we will see how she shoots after a couple hundred more rounds. At this point I am not about to change anything.

Thanks for the comments so far. I will add pictures from the next couple range trips as well. Hope this can get a few people shootin!
 
I think I will sell my Coopers and Pre 64 model 70's and Ruger 1 's and buy A few Stevens 200's and put the money I save into some long term investments that will be worth nothing 10yrs from now or keep the Stevens for 10yrs oh! they will be worth nothing as well My point is that's great that they shoot well and are inexpensive but there are others who buy rifles for others reasons shoot ability and investments.
 
I think I will sell my Coopers and Pre 64 model 70's and Ruger 1 's and buy A few Stevens 200's and put the money I save into some long term investments that will be worth nothing 10yrs from now or keep the Stevens for 10yrs oh! they will be worth nothing as well My point is that's great that they shoot well and are inexpensive but there are others who buy rifles for others reasons shoot ability and investments.

get lost troll
 
I think I will sell my Coopers and Pre 64 model 70's and Ruger 1 's and buy A few Stevens 200's and put the money I save into some long term investments that will be worth nothing 10yrs from now or keep the Stevens for 10yrs oh! they will be worth nothing as well My point is that's great that they shoot well and are inexpensive but there are others who buy rifles for others reasons shoot ability and investments.

Did I say that anyone should sell their expensive rifles and buy Stevens? I was simply wanting to let anyone out there thinking about buying one, or looking for a cheap shooter know that the Stevens is an awseome choice.

Personally I see no point buying thousand dollar rifles to be trecked through the bush in rain and snow when a Stevens can shoot like this. If I was going to spend a chunk of money on a rifle it would be a high end Savage bench rest rifle, but thats just me.

Lets not start a debate here. This is not my intention.

get lost troll

I think this pretty much sums it up!
 
As for Juanvaldeza BIG MOUTH that handle suits him perfectly .as for Mleltouaara thats absoluetly true you don't have spend a lot money on a rifle that shoots well I simply mentioned other reasons for buying rifles .
 
mine shoots gophers at 250 all the time. 100 yards its almost too easy with that gun, however this being said i plan on ordering a boyds stock from stockys stocks and a trigger and eventually a barrel from mystic precision. i love this rifle though. i already shoot it as a single shot with a follower.
 
Did I say that anyone should sell their expensive rifles and buy Stevens? I was simply wanting to let anyone out there thinking about buying one, or looking for a cheap shooter know that the Stevens is an awseome choice.

Personally I see no point buying thousand dollar rifles to be trecked through the bush in rain and snow when a Stevens can shoot like this. If I was going to spend a chunk of money on a rifle it would be a high end Savage bench rest rifle, but thats just me.

Lets not start a debate here. This is not my intention.



I think this pretty much sums it up!

You're right. For a brush/truck gun the Stevens 200 represents a great value. Bedding the rifle will improve the rifle's shot-to-shot consistency and stiffenting up the forend will help improve durability.
 
Thats excellent. I can't wait to see your next range report when you have more ammo loaded up. I'm looking for a .223 stevens right now too. I hope mine shoots as well as yours.
 
Last edited:
I got to agree for 300 and change there the best bang for your buck.I just received my stevens in 270 yesterday and had a chance to get it to the range today .I bore sighted it .fired the first shot adjusted the scope the second and adjusted again .then shot a 13/16th 3 shot group.this was with blue box federals 130gr.I have rifles that cost 2.5x that that never shoot that good out of the box.
 
Mleltovaara, that's great shooting for that amount of cash paid out.
Myself the only reason I do not own a Savage/Stevens, (I have two good friends who each own great shooting rifles on Stevens 200 actions) is I cannot get over the strange sear disengagement. That's my problem, not anyone elses.
That aside, I think these can be made into fine shooting rifles. Yours is proof too.
 
Back
Top Bottom