San & Tse
James & JR,
I think I speak on behalf of the shooting community when I say that in regards to the SA line, the service that TSE has provided and hopefully continues to provide has been exceptional given that it was TSE who sourced these rifles, worked with the RC to successfully obtain Non Restricted status on the long versions and Restricted status to the carbine and CQB and patiently worked through the sporadic supply so that we could have these in our market.
Please help us understand if we the buying public and perhaps the LE agencies may influence the parent SAN in their assignment for future distribution. I trust the TSE still holds a valid distribution contract with the subsidiary of which the parent company may simply continue to honour.
In my mind, it would be advantageous to the shooting community to support a service oriented importer/distributor who continues to invest in the shooting community by sourcing new products for the market rather than a predominantly LE only focussed supplier.
Furthermore, I feel that not only will we be better served by TSE if SAN offers dual source access for Canada, we the buying public may benefit in the form of price reductions through perhaps greater competition on these fine products. Exclusive sole source distribution only works if you have a strong distributor who will focus on the product line and has a well established supply network otherwise the 'streamlined' benefits of one importer/distributor will be lost in poor sales and a frustrated marketplace. What may we the market do to influence this distribution assignment if any?