antiqueguy: is the inability to use the firearm frequently a function of it previously being used thoroughly, or purely it's age? If the former, would looking for one in superb, rather "un used," condition change this?
The inability to use the firearm as frequently as a modern firearm is primarily due to the inferior metal used in even the best antique firearms. The steel of that time doesn't even come close to the steel used today even if it looks similar on the surface. Since the metal isn't as strong the design of the frame is even more important if you want longevity. Break action revolvers are an inherently weaker design than solid frame revolvers.
At present, there is a window of opportunity to use these antiques without licence or permit.
The legislators didn't intend to create this opportunity; it is accidental. There was never the intent to make it legal to go armed with antique handguns.
Does anyone really think that it is going to last?
For that reason, I would not buy an expensive, altered revolver. The alterations may make it a better shooter. The firearm's value is as a licence free shooter. The alterations will also have permanently degraded its value as an antique.
When the situation changes, and it is no longer legal to go armed with an antique revolver, the value and desirability of these altered shooters will collapse.
Quality unaltered antiques will retain value, based on their merits as antiques.
So, look for pieces that have inherent value, not an inflated value based on a temporary situation.
^- This is excellent. I wish that everyone interested in antiques understood this.
Dingus would be the man to ask.
Without doubt, Dingus contributes to the board. He is also the primary source of altered Webley's. (See quote by Tiriaq) Understandably he knows a great deal about these. He recommends reloading for antiques which is excellent.
That being said, If you wanted an unbiased opinion on a car would you expect one from the Ford salesman?


















































