Webley , yes I shoot mine.
I'm rural, can you tell?
But I would say that the Antique that we shoot the most, and definitely the only one that feels sufficiently sturdy to shoot 50-100 rounds through whenever we’re going shooting, is my 1883 model Reichsrevolver. It might very well be the ugliest of my guns but I feel it is as tough as any used modern revolver is likely to be. I bought a whole bunch of HSM 44 Russian Cowboy Action ammo when my local store brought it in. After 250 rounds of 200 grain “light smokeless” ammo I inspected the frame and cylinder for wear. It hasn’t stretched a .001” even, and I FPI’ed them as well just out of curiousity. No traces of any cracking under the black light.
Moving forward, I am going to tabulate the votes and put them on my original post.
Those who come across this for the first time, please continue to weigh in on your experiences.
They do fire, some of them better than others, but ultimately at the end of the day before developing an opinion, especially newer people to it, that these aren’t just loophole-handgun, firing frequently is always subject to 125 + years of abuse, neglect, modification and repair, let alone the weaker metal and limited manufacturing capabilities of their time. No matter how many votes a gun gets, the one any particular individual finds at the time could bite the dust at any point for any number of reasons
Absolutely agree.
There is a ton of general interest in antiques though, for collectors who want to use their history piece, for those who did not get "in" on time, or those that just want to legally shoot a handgun on the farm. The point of the thread is just to share personal experiences on models that are likely to be robust, statistically speaking, compared to other antiques. The original post now has a newbie friendly paragraph.