Anyone Have Experience with the Antonio Zoli 1900 Rifle?

South Pender

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
75   0   0
Location
Vancouver
Does anyone on the forum own or have some experience with the newer Antonio Zoli rifles built on an improved version of the Husqvarna or Carl Gustaf 1900 action? That action was superb and, in the minds of many, the best action that Husqvarna came up with. Zoli has taken over production of this action, and along the way, has introduced some changes--a new trigger for one. It looks like a nice rifle. I'm not sure just how available they are here in Canada, but I believe that at least one importer has picked them up. I'd be interested in hearing from those who've handled them.
 
crude copy on my opinion ...one sales man in quebec shop was trying to explain to me that the engraving were hand made lol... only good thing they came left handed ...
 
Yes, I agree about the engraving. It looks nice, but couldn't possibly be completely hand-done at the price these rifles are selling. Does anyone know how this kind of engraving is done?
iqh8s9l.jpg

Nonetheless, the Zoli rifle does incorporate some definite improvements over the original Husqvarna 1900 action: the new trigger, the separate bolt stop (rather than using the trigger sear as a bolt stop), improved safety that allows cycling the action with the safety on. I hope the Zoli model has done away with the tacky alloy bottom metal on the original Husqvarna/Carl Gustaf.
 
They are well made guns. They still are a good seller in Sweden, they consider it to be the HVA legacy (they even sell those stamped Husqvarna)
 
Honestly from looking at those pics, it's probably investment casting, looks really cheesy.
I'd rather go for a used HVA 1600 series, may as well have CRF action then a push feed, want a push feed there are Tikkas/CZ ect that are as good or better all around.
The triggers are okay for hunting with the 1600/1900, they are not a heavy pull, but have a crazy amount of over travel, I don't have any issue getting MOA or better out of the old guns, and the early 1600's came with nice polished blue steel trigger guard floor plates.
 
Honestly from looking at those pics, it's probably investment casting, looks really cheesy.
What looks cheesy about the action? Is it the engraving you don't like? As for it being an investment casting, I believe I've seen reference in Zoli ads that the action is machined from solid bar stock--like the original HVAs.
 
The receivers are made from bar stock. The 1900 trigger is a pretty good one easy to adjust.
Yes, I think the trigger that Zoli uses is an improvement over the original Husqvarna trigger. With the Zoli trigger, the sear doesn't have to do double duty as a bolt stop and, I believe, has more adjustment potential. The Zoli trigger uses ball bearings, so is perhaps somewhat akin to the excellent Bix'n Andy trigger. And it can be ordered with the single set trigger option--something we're seeing on a number of other new rifles like the Sakos.
 
I wouldn’t call it an improvement over the original Husqvarna, they both have pros and cons. In general I think the design has been improved. Either way those are great rifles, probably my favorite action.
 
It's a photochemical etching process. I am not exactly sure how it works, but early Brno's employed a similar technique. I highly doubt the Zoli receivers are investment cast. They look like nice rifles, but as Hitzy said, if you want a quality push feed, CZ and Tikka are probably the most sensible choices.
 
It's a photochemical etching process. I am not exactly sure how it works, but early Brno's employed a similar technique. I highly doubt the Zoli receivers are investment cast. They look like nice rifles, but as Hitzy said, if you want a quality push feed, CZ and Tikka are probably the most sensible choices.

Depending on the year you can find real engraving on them.
Tikka did make some models that could compete but the 1900s, Zoli or others, are in another league than the T3.
 
Any place in Canada have these rifles, Google came up empty, I don't like the engraving but would be interested in a plain model, 1900s are my favourite Huskys.
 
Depending on the year you can find real engraving on them.
I guess that depends on what you mean by "real engraving." If you mean having an engraver do the pattern entirely by hand (as in some custom guns), then you aren't going to find that on a regularly-priced production model.

Here's what real hand-engraving looks like, first in the white:

eA8RZr3.jpg
;
tKJgK8z.jpg


and then once blued (the oval with the squirrel engraving is done with a French Grey finish):

6JnaveB.jpg
wpAS1hf.jpg
s3GUquG.jpg


That level and style of true hand-engraving costs thousands. (The particular rifle shown, a Sako P94S .22LR, was engraved by Bruce Farman, a member of the American Custom Gunmakers Guild.) What we see on the Zolis (and many others, like the deluxe Sakos) is most certainly machine done or at the very least machine-aided at a low cost and requiring minimal human involvement.

Tikka did make some models that could compete but the 1900s, Zoli or others, are in another league than the T3.
These Zoli rifles (and others using the 1900-action) are in a completely different class than the Tikkas and CZs. In his excellent and comprehensive book, The Bolt Action Vol. II, Stuart Otteson wrote:

"If prizes were awarded in firearms design, this Carl Gustaf [the 1900 series] rifle would surely be at or near the top in the category of commercial bolt actions. The short lifespan of what Eric Cläesson described as the "pearl" of FFV's sporting arms line is thus particularly ironic and regrettable

"It was neither perfect nor remarkably novel or innovative. The trigger could use some work, and a lot of people didn't care much for the die-cast trigger guard [that would be my only criticism]. A safety thumbpiece made from something other than sheet metal would have looked a lot nicer. Yet it was overall a refreshingly sound and well balanced action, crisp and uncluttered, and embodying consummate good taste. It exuded precision and workmanship, and functioned with a smoothness rare in modern rifles."


Otteson was referring to the run of the Swedish 1900s; the Zoli carries that on to the present time.
 
Last edited:
I guess that depends on what you mean by "real engraving." If you mean having an engraver do the pattern entirely by hand (as in some custom guns), then you aren't going to find that on a regularly-priced production model.


These Zoli rifles (and others using the 1900-action) are in a completely different class than the Tikkas and CZs.

not the ones i handled. cz550 is way over it and tikka is a good 500 dollar rifle sold for more ...
 
Honestly from looking at those pics, it's probably investment casting, looks really cheesy.
I'd rather go for a used HVA 1600 series, may as well have CRF action then a push feed, want a push feed there are Tikkas/CZ ect that are as good or better all around.
The triggers are okay for hunting with the 1600/1900, they are not a heavy pull, but have a crazy amount of over travel, I don't have any issue getting MOA or better out of the old guns, and the early 1600's came with nice polished blue steel trigger guard floor plates.

Agreed. Tradeex has a tempting 9.3x62 unit on their site at the moment. ;)
 
And I was misquoted... I said CZ or Tikka are more sensible choices. The Savage Axis, Mossberg or the entry Rugers are not in the same League.

Back on topic... the 1900 series were fine rifles, but they have nothing over a CZ557 or Tikka T3. These modern push feed rifles have better triggers and tighter tolerances, and you can get both with nice walnut stocks. The only advantage with the Zoli, in my opinion, is that the Zoli might have polished blued finishes, but I am not certain. You have to pay a bundle more for that.
 
Back
Top Bottom