AR Collapsible Butt Stocks, That Are Solid For Accurate Shooting?

I have a Fab Defense GL http://www.fab-defense.com/en/category-buttstocks/id-208/m4-m16-shock-absorbing-buttstock.html

It has some sort of inner friction fit to make it fit either commercial or mil-spec tubes...I've had it on both and it was rattle free on both. Has a great 'tire tread' rubber buttplate that really grips the shoulder.

208-glshock-png-Thu-Nov-24-7-17-56.png
 
Redhouse said:
I have a Fab Defense GL http://www.fab-defense.com/en/category-buttstocks/id-208/m4-m16-shock-absorbing-buttstock.html

It has some sort of inner friction fit to make it fit either commercial or mil-spec tubes...I've had it on both and it was rattle free on both. Has a great 'tire tread' rubber buttplate that really grips the shoulder.

208-glshock-png-Thu-Nov-24-7-17-56.png
Click to expand...

Yup,
Looks good. I like that. I would buy that. I am still really stuck on my Magpul CTR though. PRS would be the ultimate for long range though.
 
Brordo said:
For precision I'm all about the PRS...but otherwise, I'm quite particular to the UBR (but settled on the CTR due to cost :().
Click to expand...

I went with the UBR for my PDS in 6.8 SPC instead. For starters, the PSD is already as light as sin - so this balances it out perfectly. For another, the UBR is a stock that's meant to be used as opposed to just resting on a bench.

For my LMT308MWS I went with an ACS. It has (IMHO) a perfect LOP and cheek weld, and there's about a pound of weight savings over the PRS or UBR - which allows me to mount an Atlas bipod essentially with a zero net weight gain. I'm also going to run the enhanced stock pad as I find it more comfortable. With what I'm going to save on the ACS that also basically pays for the Atlas bipod, too - so that's another huge incentive. If need be I've also got a padded ambidextrous cheek pad that works great with the ACS if needed.

DARKSTANG said:
The shotgun stocks are pretty Fugly. As far as that other one, you don't like that? I guess it is kinda like the CTR/ACS mix. It does look better than an M4 stock, for sure. Right?
Click to expand...

The STR? I'd probably have to try it out, but I'm not big on the storage aspect and the cheek weld is covered with a LaRue RISR, so... (between the STR and ACS-L, the STR probably fills more of a gap). As I said, the standard M4 stock never bothered me. Keeps the price down and allows me to buy the stock I really want.

Redhouse said:
I have a Fab Defense GL.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's not bad either. I've been drinking the Magpul koolaid for too long, though... ;)
 
We just got a large Magpul shipment in. I'm down at Blast Off but there is a picture on our facebook page of how much arrived. Got lots of stocks in the shipment.
 
Going a different route, I feel all my stocks are that much tighter on my PWS Enhanced buffer tube from Questar. My CTR on that buffer tube is a rock.
 
Slightly off-topic; would a Milspec-MOE stock fit on a Commercial tube? (tightly obviously, but not so tight as to prevent install?)

I was wondering if it'd be a convenient way of getting a solid fit without the going the CTR route.
 
G37 said:
Slightly off-topic; would a Milspec-MOE stock fit on a Commercial tube? (tightly obviously, but not so tight as to prevent install?)

I was wondering if it'd be a convenient way of getting a solid fit without the going the CTR route.
Click to expand...

Anything fits when you use power tools.

Just sayin'
 
G37 said:
Slightly off-topic; would a Milspec-MOE stock fit on a Commercial tube? (tightly obviously, but not so tight as to prevent install?)

I was wondering if it'd be a convenient way of getting a solid fit without the going the CTR route.
Click to expand...

Definitely a "no". With a dremel and some elbow grease it's possible that you could turn into a fixed stock, though...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom