AR legal question.

Are AR lowers considered firearms or it is just the upper?

This is the "firearm"...

S&W-812000_1.jpg


just the lower receiver.
 
They're a bugger to get a trigger lock on, what with them not having a trigger and all.

Does that actually require a trigger lock? I recall something from my CFSC about removing major fire control components meant you didn't need a trigger lock on a restricted if it was just in a locked cabinet because it didn't function.
 
Double locked is the rule, you don't need a trigger lock if you for example, have it in a locked room, and have the front door to your house locked, that equals 2 locks.

Trigger locks are not mandatory.
 
Double locked is the rule, you don't need a trigger lock if you for example, have it in a locked room, and have the front door to your house locked, that equals 2 locks.

Trigger locks are not mandatory.

Unless you let someone who is not an RPAL holder in your house; and you let them leave your sight...then its only one lock.:runaway:

Those cable locks would suffice; or a safe.
 
Double locked is the rule, you don't need a trigger lock if you for example, have it in a locked room, and have the front door to your house locked, that equals 2 locks.

Trigger locks are not mandatory.

ajayofcanada and VictorF you are both incorrect !!!!!

The front door is NOT applicable as a lock.

If in a case or a cabinet the restricted firearm REQUIRES a lock rendering it inoperable (trigger or cable lock) AND the cabinet MUST be locked REGARDLESS of whether the house is locked or not !!!!
 
Are AR lowers considered firearms or it is just the upper?

Are you serious?? You dont know the lower on a AR is the registered part and you are giving people crap in the other thread about being qualified to train with a black rifle??

I think you need a refresher in the very basics ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom