I know this came up in the past, but I can't seem to find it.
My question is, in light of MRP and VIS upper, are monolithic upper have advantage over AR upper with separate handguard? Some claim that it offers better balance and overall shooting, but I really don't know what that means, while others say monolithic offers more solid platform and less movement, since the whole upper is in one piece. But I seem to recall someone arguing that having separate upper and handguard is better.
What's the verdict on this? Is there clear advantage at all, between these two approach?
p.s. Concerning VLTOR VIS upper, is it comparable to other AR upper, in terms of quality? I know it's extreme to question it, but is the product battle worthy? How does it compare to, say, Larue or DD?
My question is, in light of MRP and VIS upper, are monolithic upper have advantage over AR upper with separate handguard? Some claim that it offers better balance and overall shooting, but I really don't know what that means, while others say monolithic offers more solid platform and less movement, since the whole upper is in one piece. But I seem to recall someone arguing that having separate upper and handguard is better.
What's the verdict on this? Is there clear advantage at all, between these two approach?
p.s. Concerning VLTOR VIS upper, is it comparable to other AR upper, in terms of quality? I know it's extreme to question it, but is the product battle worthy? How does it compare to, say, Larue or DD?




















































