So, there are a couple of different discussions going on with respect to lowers of different brands. I'm a noob with my first (Core15) incoming, and I'm doing TONS of reading and watching vids right now. Of course, now I'm looking at parts and a build for a second, and I don't have my first yet
. Mmmm, that koolaid was pretty good.
Anyways, I get that one should use what they have and figure out what works and what doesn't. But what would be nice to see is a chart, table, comparison, whatever that actually shows what features are on different brands - then, when one gets to the point of knowing what they want, there would be a reference point available.
Given my knowledge base is *beginning of the learning curve* at best, feel free to add brands - I know there are many beyond this list. Your commentary can be of either a stripped or equipped lower, or even of the lower that only comes on a finished rifle.
Lowers Only: Key Features and/or Detriments
There's a great reference on general rifle builds from some 'common' manufacturers here https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0AqmgMm61Ok7WdExwaG16OENzOEZ1akp2a3Y2NjMxTEE&single=true&gid=2&output=html including sections broken out for lowers, bolts, barrels & uppers. link courtesy of m4carbine dot net
*While forged truly is a small % stronger than billet, the generally accepted wisdom is that both are more than strong enough for the platform. In the same vein, 7075 is stronger than 6061 but both will get the job done.
**high shelf vs. low shelf {{{SEE POST #9}}}- This is in reference to RDIAS compatibility. RDIAS is Registered Drop In Auto Sear (full auto --> low shelf). A RDIAS, which can be found for much less than an registered M-16 or other AR-15 compatible registered select fire lower receiver. Google is your friend. Info stolen from AR15 dot com
***just because the same forging (CMT, LMT, etc.) is used means not much, there can be substantial differences in level of finish (removing machine marks, etc) + external finish (anodizing, etc.) quality, per finished product manufacturer. Also, different builders may require different specifications, ie., some CMT (name used for illustration purposes only) may be mil-spec, some may have different non-mil dimensions.
Anyways, I get that one should use what they have and figure out what works and what doesn't. But what would be nice to see is a chart, table, comparison, whatever that actually shows what features are on different brands - then, when one gets to the point of knowing what they want, there would be a reference point available.
Given my knowledge base is *beginning of the learning curve* at best, feel free to add brands - I know there are many beyond this list. Your commentary can be of either a stripped or equipped lower, or even of the lower that only comes on a finished rifle.
Lowers Only: Key Features and/or Detriments
- CANADIAN
--- - ATRS - MADE IN CANADA, billet 7075, Gen4 now in production with ambi bolt release and ambi safety.
--- - Blue Line - 7075-T6 forged
--- - Cadex - MADE IN CANADA, billet 7075-T6
--- - Dlask Arms - 7075-T6 forged
--- - Diemaco/Colt Canada - (some were CMT)
--- - NEA15 - MADE IN CANADA, billet 6061
---
- IMPORT
--- - Aero Precision - high shelf
--- - Armalite - Did forge and machine their own, both uppers and lowers. Now believed to be Aero. High shelf
--- - BCM
--- - Bushmaster - (was CMT made/forged, some possibly LMT/forged, also read LAR)(Since bought by Remington, use DPMS - which, it is said, are LAR) Low shelf
--- - CMMG
--- - Colt - (possibly CMT made/forged, possibly in house) High shelf, and for many years machined with auto sear block, current production does not have the block. The Colt sear block was in use from '91 to '95. New Colt's have small pivot pins and small trigger pins
--- - Core15 - forged 7075-T6, class II hardcoat anodized, beveled magwell. 'Hardcore' series is billet, with very low profile magwell and oversized trigger guard.
--- - Daniel Defense
--- - DPMS - (possibly LAR made/forged) (some are 6061) Low shelf
--- - DSArms - in house (I also read LMT made)
--- - Knights (KAC) - (LMT made/forged - another post says they make their own 'cut' = billet?) Ambi bolt catch and mag release with push button sling cup built into the lower
--- - Larue
--- - LMT - (self made, distributor/manufacturer) High shelf
--- - Lone Wolf R&D
--- - Mega - (self made - MMS = Mega Machine Shop) 7075-T6. Low shelf
--- - Norinco - made in China.
--- - Noveske - (LAR made/forged, I also read CMT made) - Gen2 has one piece trigger guard and a flared magwell
--- - Palmeto State Armorey - Old AP serials made by Aero Precision newer LW serials made by LWSchneider. 7075-T6 forged current production.
--- - PWS
--- - Remington - (DPMS)
--- - Rock River - (CMT made/forged) High shelf
--- - Smith & Wesson - (CMT made/forged) (Performance Center is in house/billet) High shelf
--- - Spike's Tactical - Wide range of serials made by different companys - current reading says LAR + MMS + others. Low shelf (?)
--- - Stag - (CMT made/forged) High shelf
--- - STI
--- - VLTOR - 7075 forged, custom machined oversized mag release, magwell grip enhancing cuts
--- - Vulcan Armaments - Carbon/Aramid Lower Receiver
--- - Wilson - (at least some are CMT made/forged)
There's a great reference on general rifle builds from some 'common' manufacturers here https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0AqmgMm61Ok7WdExwaG16OENzOEZ1akp2a3Y2NjMxTEE&single=true&gid=2&output=html including sections broken out for lowers, bolts, barrels & uppers. link courtesy of m4carbine dot net
*While forged truly is a small % stronger than billet, the generally accepted wisdom is that both are more than strong enough for the platform. In the same vein, 7075 is stronger than 6061 but both will get the job done.
**high shelf vs. low shelf {{{SEE POST #9}}}- This is in reference to RDIAS compatibility. RDIAS is Registered Drop In Auto Sear (full auto --> low shelf). A RDIAS, which can be found for much less than an registered M-16 or other AR-15 compatible registered select fire lower receiver. Google is your friend. Info stolen from AR15 dot com
***just because the same forging (CMT, LMT, etc.) is used means not much, there can be substantial differences in level of finish (removing machine marks, etc) + external finish (anodizing, etc.) quality, per finished product manufacturer. Also, different builders may require different specifications, ie., some CMT (name used for illustration purposes only) may be mil-spec, some may have different non-mil dimensions.
Last edited:



















































