Archangel stock

KRG Bravo is a better value proposition.

Better quality, a lot more support from the manufacturer for accessories. You can really "dress it up" if you want to, KRG knocked it out of the park with that chassis. Accessories such as bag riders, NV bridges, adjustable tool-less but pad, weight kits, spigot mounts, RRS/ARCA rails, pic rails, etc. are all available (and more). Ergo's are excellent. It punches way above it's weight class.

The Archangel is a cheap looking JAE knock-off. I personally wouldn't spend extra money to buy a rifle with an Archangel chassis. If it's a smoking deal, you can always buy the rifle, see if you like the chassis, and if not then hawk it.

If it was me, and I wanted a Bergara, I would buy a Bergara and put it in a KRG Bravo. If it's a rifle on the CGN EE, it's probably overpriced anyways :p
 
Id take one. They aren't as popular as all the other chassis system everyone needs to shoot accurately, but they are easily adjustable, decent ergonomics and affordable.

If you get one and its well bedded I don't think you'll notice much difference in group size at mid range to the next cool chassis system, if you buy it and change your mind you could always buy a different stock and put it on the EE.
 
Decent ergonomics.. grip is a bit small so will fit any hand. Adjustments are fine. Layout is very contemporary. Mag is a m1a variant so shorter then some AICS options. They do work.

Material is tough as nails and the stock is both heavy and rigid. The included bipod is kind of silly but it will keep the rifle off the dirt.

If promag ever decides to run AICS mags instead of their own stuff, demand could have been stronger but they don't seem to want to change.

They are one of the best all polymer stock options ... however, there are now more options in the 'plastic' stock, cheaper chassis category and that is what I would recommend and offer today.

Jerry
 
Back
Top Bottom