Are these Sasquatch tracks or what ??
- Thread starter MustangFrank
- Start date
Wild_Thing
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- In the thick of it!
Only around the Pemberton area, lol
Drove home to borrow it from my wife, and get camera.
Londonshooter
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- SW Ontario
I was wondering the same regarding yardstick. Also why no tracks of yourself so thought either a hard crust or else you tossed the yardstick then took the photo rather than contaminating the scene with your own footprints. As you said, interesting...
I totally buy the prints are a jogger except for where they came from and where they went seems hard to explain. Not seeing barefoot tracks or as Kodiak pointed out any distinct great toe.
2 deer seasons ago I heard big time splashing in a pond and approached closer expecting to see a swimming deer or moose. But instead there was something swimming under water across the pond that had to be 4 feet wide by 12 feet long. 20 seconds later 5 otter heads popped up.
Last edited:
OkayShooter
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Nova Scotia
Sasquatch only leaves one foot print.
- Location
- Richmond, BC
What round for sasquatch defence?
There is no harm keeping a metre stick in the vehicle. I've been doing it for years. The tracks are not sasquatch but yeti. This is easily distinguishable by the high arch. yetis were introduced in the seventies to control mushroom pickers in certain areas.
Something with Tyrannosaur in the name of course!
You try it. Film yourself doing it and measure the tracks.
I don't think it is up to skeptics to disprove something like this. It is up to you as a believer of something that has never been proven to get hard evidence of your theory. It seams like you have already made up your mind and will not accept anything to the contrary.
As far fetched as it would be, i would believe that these tracks are made by a one legged kangaroo that escaped from someones house before i believe the bigfoot theory, if only because i know that kangaroos exist.
You have a large burden of proof to supply before you can claim that some slightly strange melted track are made by a large beast that has never been definitively proven to exist.
- Location
- Ford Nation
It's a shame that the snow melted and the tracks lost all of their fine details. I highly doubt that it was someone jogging when you take into consideration that the tracks came out of bush and were only on the road for 25 yards or so and then went back into the woods towards a creek. doesn't sound like a place very conducive to jogging.
I agree it definitly is strange but that isn't evidence of a sasquach.
I already said I am neither a believer or non believer. I just posted something I found way too difficult to explain given the circumstances. Others have presented theories that are less believable than the Sasquatch theory so I pointed out the difficulty with their theories. We're just having some fun here.
(thread crossover episode)I would hope that never happens.
That's the only evidence that will conclusively prove they exist. Tracks can be faked, photos can be faked, video can be faked... there's so much fakery that even if the tracks/photos were real, nobody would believe it. It's going to require a body on a slab.
