Too many variables. Each one would be superior to the other in certain situations, it just depends what you are looking for.
Popurhedoff said:I have both... there is no comparision between price and dependability, I prefer my Glocks.
IM_Lugger said:I’m not a big fan if either…they are two completely different guns so it’s hard to answer your question. I voted for 1911 only because I like the looks of it better and not a fan of the Glock grip angle. But if I had to defend myself with a gun (1911 or Glock) I’d take the Glock.
If you want a fair comparison, compare Glock to HK and XD, even K100. 1911 is not really in the same category...
My SW1911 has fed everything including 165 JHP, 185 +P JHP, 200 grain SWC reloads and 230 grain ball and hollow points. The only exception was some Winchester NT when I had a shok-buff installed. Once the shok-buff was out the pistol returned to 100 per cent reliability.antediluvianist said:To me it's a matter of reliability. In the reliability department - and it's my experience, yours might differ - my Glock was practically malfunction-free: with any bullet shape. Would that that had been true for my 1911.
Bartledan said:IM_Lugger said:I’m not a big fan if either…they are two completely different guns so it’s hard to answer your question. I voted for 1911 only because I like the looks of it better and not a fan of the Glock grip angle. But if I had to defend myself with a gun (1911 or Glock) I’d take the Glock.
If you want a fair comparison, compare Glock to HK and XD, even K100. 1911 is not really in the same category...
It's less than 12" long, capcble of use one handed, and makes little pieces of lead go thataway at useful speeds. How in the world are they nnot in the same category?
The theroetical evildoer that gets ventilated by said bits of lead certainly would argue that they are, in fact, the same category.




























