Well I guess you would consider ANY AR10 style rifle unproven then, the design of the AR10 is only a mere 60 years old and totally unproven.
All we did is take the AR10 design and modify it some and added some features that are fairly common in higher end AR style rifles.
Just because YOU have not seen 1 shoot does not mean it has not happened, so YES YOU ARE MISTAKEN, we have had the prototype gun out to several ranges over the last couple of months.
We DO have to send a production rifle back to the RCMP for final approval so that they are satisfied that the final product is the essentially the same as the crude prototype we originally submitted. This will happen in the next week or so. We are told by Bill Etter that final inspection should only take a few weeks. All that has changed since the prototype was approved are cosmetic improvements and refinements to things like the charge handle and the addition of an integral ambi bolt release, so the chances of it being classified as anything but NON restricted is incredibly low as the operating system and dimensions of both the upper and lower have not changed, so our upper and lower are still 100% NON compatible with any other makers AR10 style rifle.
Well of course it can fire. That would be a requirement of the first passing of the FRT #.
As for testing the beta model. How many rounds have you put through it, 50, 100, 1000, 10000?
There's a bunch of other issues I would consider prior to placing money forth for a product that has not hit production.
Your 75 unit prebuy also strikes me as action taken to raise capital for production, but that's just me.
Epoxy7 has left some good info for caramel. I would only add that HK MR308 20" beats them all......because it's HK!
and I happen to have one.
All hail HK, all hail!

I have found armalite has a better quality. But that's just me.
Caramel, the DPMS REPRE is currently obsolete. Unless you can get a smoking deal there is no point. It was designed to bea lighter version of their SASS only they upped the billet upper/lower to 7021 along with a match grade DM profile barrel from an unidentified high end barrel maker. The problem is a current G2 SASS is lighter and 7075 forged as well as being cheaper. The barrel on the REPRE may still be better, but you could spin on a Krieger etc later and have a superior rifle. Again if there was a blow out sale then I'd have to re evaluate.
The LMT is the next step up.
What do you guys think about the HK MR 308, it's caught my eye recently. And is there an advantage to 20" barrel over 16"? I'm looking for a battle rifle not a DMR.
I don't mean to hijack the thread.
Epoxy7, have you noticed a big difference in accuracy between the makes?
Don't get sucked in by non restricted right now. There is nothing that compares with the above rifles in non restricted at this moment. I absolutely refuse to gamble on the latest not yet released products. In fact with one product out there I'd burn the down deposit money rather than ordering one simply on principle. Stick with what is actually available and proven. For the type of money we are talking about there is no point messing around or taking risks.
New regulations will be released today to the public. Prior to today the details were only known by those at the table including industry representatives and a few with contacts. Sort of insider trader information if someone was planning to push a product with this info before the release. So to avoid that conflict of interest I would recommend holding off until the info is public. Later today I believe. Then the decision process should be a bit easier.
Well I guess you would consider ANY AR10 style rifle unproven then, the design of the AR10 is only a mere 60 years old and totally unproven.
All we did is take the AR10 design and modify it some and added some features that are fairly common in higher end AR style rifles.
Just because YOU have not seen 1 shoot does not mean it has not happened, so YES YOU ARE MISTAKEN, we have had the prototype gun out to several ranges over the last couple of months.
We DO have to send a production rifle back to the RCMP for final approval so that they are satisfied that the final product is the essentially the same as the crude prototype we originally submitted. This will happen in the next week or so. We are told by Bill Etter that final inspection should only take a few weeks. All that has changed since the prototype was approved are cosmetic improvements and refinements to things like the charge handle and the addition of an integral ambi bolt release, so the chances of it being classified as anything but NON restricted is incredibly low as the operating system and dimensions of both the upper and lower have not changed, so our upper and lower are still 100% NON compatible with any other makers AR10 style rifle.
So giving out speculative info is helping in what way? You keep claiming I was privy to these government discussions yet again you are wrong.
I will be just as surprised as 99.9% of the Canadian gun culture if your claims that AR s and such are all magically re-classified as NON restricted and that the mag laws are all repealed.
I am at a loss as to how exactly it is that YOU know what is inside my head. Your claims that I know what is coming in so far as changes to the laws are total B.S., SO let me go on record as it did not seem to sink in via all of your PMs. Either put out some proof or stop with your empty allegations.
I for one do not see how the ATR gun could be NR -- I mean the SR-25 was restricted as someone deemed it a AR-15 variant.

atm,the best ''prodie''' ar-10 is the lmt mrp with the optional 20SS barrel.pouic.
then,the custom ones like your upcoming GAP.
Good stuff that you're glad about the potential changes. Me too. Those on the pre order list probably not so much!



























