Army drops Smith & Wesson from pistol competition to replace the M9

Melnibonean

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
177   0   0
Location
The Orion Arm
By Matthew Cox, Military.com
Sep 26, 2016 3:26:44 pm

The Army recently notified Smith & Wesson that it is out of the competition to replace the Beretta M9 9mm pistol. | US Army photo

7f34b175.jpg



The U.S. Army has dropped Smith & Wesson from its Modular Handgun System competition, according to a Sept. 23 report Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation made to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Smith & Wesson, which was partnered with General Dynamics, was one of five gun makers competing to replace the Army’s M9 9mm pistol.

“We and our partner in the pursuit of the U.S. Army’s Modular Handgun System, or MHS, solicitation to replace the M9 standard Army sidearm have been notified by the Department of the Army that our proposal was not selected to advance to the next phase of the competition,” according to the SEC report.

TheFirearmBlog.com was the first to report the news about Smith & Wesson.

As far as we know, the Army is still evaluating striker-fired pistols from Glock, Sig Sauer, Beretta and FN Herstal, according to a source familiar with the competition.

It will be interesting to find out why Smith & Wesson didn’t make it to the next round of MHS.

“We are assessing our options in response to the notification and remain focused on achieving our long-term strategy of organically and inorganically expanding our product offerings in the consumer market for shooting, hunting, and rugged outdoor enthusiasts,” Smith & Wesson officials said in the SEC report.



http://www.wearethemighty.com/articles/army-drops-smith-wesson-from-pistol-competition
 
I've only recently acquired a beretta 92fs and think they should stick with that... I still shoot better with my CZ, but the beretta for sure has less felt recoil. For sure less than an m&p or a glock! I get that it's a big old pistol, but still handles nice in my limited experience.
 
I've only recently acquired a beretta 92fs and think they should stick with that... I still shoot better with my CZ, but the beretta for sure has less felt recoil. For sure less than an m&p or a glock! I get that it's a big old pistol, but still handles nice in my limited experience.

By that reasoning, they shouldn't have abandoned the 1911 for an Italian 9mm...but I digress. They want something that is rust proof (read 'polymer') and easy to field strip, will take much abuse, and continue to work, and most importantly, is Dummy Proof. So that leaves you with a polymer striker fired Glock/Sig/FN I guess. I'd put money on the Glock winning the contract, only because there is such a Glock love for anything polymer. Me, I'd take the Sig or FN, but what do I know......
 
By that reasoning, they shouldn't have abandoned the 1911 for an Italian 9mm...but I digress. They want something that is rust proof (read 'polymer') and easy to field strip, will take much abuse, and continue to work, and most importantly, is Dummy Proof. So that leaves you with a polymer striker fired Glock/Sig/FN I guess. I'd put money on the Glock winning the contract, only because there is such a Glock love for anything polymer. Me, I'd take the Sig or FN, but what do I know......

Polymer guns. Rust proof except all the working parts. The m9 has an aluminum frame which won't rust either.
 
I just don't understand why they need this dog and pony show. Issue Glocks, cheap and cheerful and already in service with your tier one operators. In truth the side arm is the most underused piece of kit in any deployment
 
I just don't understand why they need this dog and pony show. Issue Glocks, cheap and cheerful and already in service with your tier one operators. In truth the side arm is the most underused piece of kit in any deployment

On a related note, I've heard rumblings that some PD's are having issues with more recently manufactured Glocks.
 
I just don't understand why they need this dog and pony show. Issue Glocks, cheap and cheerful and already in service with your tier one operators. In truth the side arm is the most underused piece of kit in any deployment

They will, as they already issue it

IIRC glock 19 are already in the inventory

Shawn
 
By that reasoning, they shouldn't have abandoned the 1911 for an Italian 9mm...but I digress. They want something that is rust proof (read 'polymer') and easy to field strip, will take much abuse, and continue to work, and most importantly, is Dummy Proof. So that leaves you with a polymer striker fired Glock/Sig/FN I guess. I'd put money on the Glock winning the contract, only because there is such a Glock love for anything polymer. Me, I'd take the Sig or FN, but what do I know......
As mentioned before Beretta frames dont rust, they're also the easiest gun to field strip I know of and pretty easy to operate. Polymer makes sense because of lower weight and newer offering have interchangeable grips.

Glock has a good chance of taking the contract if they dont cancel it again lol. I didn't really expect M&P to win always thought FN has a better chance. I wouldn't discount the Beretta tho, I'm sure they have APX in the running seems like a promising gun.
 
I just don't understand why they need this dog and pony show. Issue Glocks, cheap and cheerful and already in service with your tier one operators. In truth the side arm is the most underused piece of kit in any deployment

Pretend there is some impartiality to selection.
 
Back
Top Bottom