Asked to provide pictures of lower to RCMP before they will complete transfer?

I think in this case, where a transfer is in progress, if it looks like it may be prohibited, the best thing would be cancel the transfer, and fade into the woodwork, hoping the RCMP doesn't come looking. If they do ("Since it's prohibited, sir, you'll have to turn it in"), then the next step would be get a lawyer onside and fight, or give it up peacefully (probably depending on your financial situation).

This is a perfect example of what the orgs should be getting involved with. They all seem to slow to react. A phone call to an org from one owner saying "I measured my lower, and I think it's prohibited", should immediately be met with independent confirmation of the measurements, and if prohibited, the lawyer comes onsite, and a call to the RCMP is made "I have a lower that you believe is a prohibited firearm. I have no plans to let it out of my possession. Your move", and see if they flinch. Nonsense like this has to be challenged before it gets out of hand.
 
sulisa said:
I think in this case, where a transfer is in progress, if it looks like it may be prohibited, the best thing would be cancel the transfer, and fade into the woodwork, hoping the RCMP doesn't come looking. If they do ("Since it's prohibited, sir, you'll have to turn it in"), then the next step would be get a lawyer onside and fight, or give it up peacefully (probably depending on your financial situation).

This is a perfect example of what the orgs should be getting involved with. They all seem to slow to react. A phone call to an org from one owner saying "I measured my lower, and I think it's prohibited", should immediately be met with independent confirmation of the measurements, and if prohibited, the lawyer comes onsite, and a call to the RCMP is made "I have a lower that you believe is a prohibited firearm. I have no plans to let it out of my possession. Your move", and see if they flinch. Nonsense like this has to be challenged before it gets out of hand.
Click to expand...

Couldn't they just punch that gun in to registry data and then send letters to every who owns the same lower and ask to confiscate. I'm sure they pull this sp1 standard out of their ass to pick us apart and confiscate AR at small group at a time to hope not to spark an national out rage. That's why we all need to fight this before they break us one by one.

When they do come for my AR I'll just hand them a block of molten alloy. " Hey you said it's a prohib receiver . I best just to destroy it before it starts eating babies "
 
RUSTSPOT said:
When they do come for my AR I'll just hand them a block of molten alloy. " Hey you said it's a prohib receiver . I best just to destroy it before it starts eating babies "
Click to expand...

I would say that's the perfect way to do it... a molten slag pile, with a still-readable original serial number :)
 
Cameron SS said:
I doubt anyone has ever proactively called the RCMP and told them you have an AR that does not meet the their new contrived legal argument to have ARs prohibited. Its not a policy, its a witch hunt, and fortunately ARs that do not conform are about as common as witches.
Click to expand...

Yeah but people who have received letters must have followed-up with RCMP and provided pictures... what happened next?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom