Automating Dillon 1050 - Has Anyone Done It?

GunCrazy

Member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Location
Langley, BC
I'm looking at trying to automate a Dillon 1050 or even a Hornady Lock N Load Ammo Plant.

Has anyone on this board tackled such a project?

See tons of videos on YouTube but they don't going into specific about the cam / crank gear they use.
 
Unless you have everything perfectly dialed in, your realistic load rate is about 1500 RPH. I found once I start moving north of tha the primer system can start to get wonky. I process 30 caliber cartridges at 1800, load pistol at 1500, and process 223 at 1200. Anything faster in my expierience leads to headaches.
 
I have a simple Ponnes-warren system; their motor and a bunch of safety switch wiring on my part - running 1200 rounds of 9mm an hour now.
It's very sensitive to having well-prepped brass, but other than that - it works great.

My buddy has ordered Jay Hirschberg's system like you guys have posted about above - it's supposed to work with range brass, so I'm looking forward to seeing how he makes out.
 
it is a great option for commercial loaders vs the camdex, etc. much lower cost and allows you to have several working at once.

Yes, to a point I concur. I process large quantities of 223 brass on my 1050 for lots of people in the action shooting community.

I waiver the statement with this. I am speaking from my experience. When I reference 1500 rounds per hour, that does not mean I spool up to 1500, and then shut down when I am out of primer, projectiles, powder, brass. I spin it up to 1500 and it runs for an hour straight, minus any stoppages, and have someone keeping the machine fed. I believe that you could run 3 machines at that speed with 4 people though. I am using an RF-100, but you would have to replace that with a Camdex Syntron. It would be too much work to have 3 x RF-100's on the go to keep up.

The 1050, without some pretty serious mods is not capable of the production, nor level of quality that the Camdex is. There are two key things:

Processing

You can trim on the 1050 and you cannot on the Camdex (From the factory there are blank stations on the Camdex at the end which you could theoretically put an RT-1500)
The quality of the swage on the 1050 is suspect unless you have it dialed in perfectly. The swage quality degrades if you put mixed brass through it whereas the Camdex adjusts the swage automatically
The camdex has the built in checks, whereas the dillon relies on the operator. Meaning on the Dillon, your culls must be much more thorough.

Loading

Want to achieve a high cyclic rate? You cannot put range brass in and expect quality end product. It must be processed in some fashion prior to trying to load. For 223, I found the two pass system causes the least amount of headaches. Process, then load.

I have never had the Dillon through a double charge or squib. For the commercial reloader though; statistically over 5 million rounds (the serviceable lifespan of a well maintained Super 1050) your chance of having an error which you would not catch is much greater. I have played with the idea of an optical powder check to retain the bullet feeder, otherwise you cannot really have bullet feed and powder check.

I think the commercial re loaders who use the 1050 platform are essentially playing with fire. Unless they are only running one machine at a time and supervising it well. As it is a two person job really to even keep one fed and supervised at 1500 rounds per hour.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom