Bits of Pieces re-barreled a Storm to non-restricted for a buddy of mine and refused to return the original barrel. Probably sold it. Won't deal with him again.
Bits of Pieces re-barreled a Storm to non-restricted for a buddy of mine and refused to return the original barrel. Probably sold it. Won't deal with him again.
That is because the oem barrel was a restricted device.
I went through this with Barry several years ago.
I didnt do the restricted conversion to non because I found a non-restricted for about $100 cheaper than doing the conversion route.
Feel free to not like dealing with Barry, but there is always more to the original story ...
I see Jerry has stepped up to offer his expertise too .
Tight Groups,
Rob
That is because the oem barrel was a restricted device.
I went through this with Barry several years ago.
I didnt do the restricted conversion to non because I found a non-restricted for about $100 cheaper than doing the conversion route.
Feel free to not like dealing with Barry, but there is always more to the original story ...
I see Jerry has stepped up to offer his expertise too .
Tight Groups,
Rob
Hmmm, to my knowledge, there isn't an issue with a "restricted length device" such as a barrel. You may be getting the law confused with barrels in the "prohibited" class which have a classification of their own.
You need a special addendum to your license to have "prohibited devices'' but your RPAL covers "restricted'' devices.
If he could own the original storm he could own the takeoff barrel….