Ok, so I've ordered a Shilen barrel blank for my .300 Blackout build. I plan on using a donor Rem 700 and a LTR stock. I was looking to keep the barrel length between 14"-16" but I am no sure of the legality in doing so. My combination will be well over the 26" minimum OAL requirement, so my area of concern is only with the barrel length.
I know it's a commonly held "opinion" here on this site that as long as the finished barrel is manufactured from a barrel blank and not a cut down manufactured barrel, then it is permissable to use a length less than 18.5" while maintaining a non-restricted status.
However, what basis in actual law exists for one to come to that conclusion? I can't find information that would support this.
The legal definition of a prohibited firearm is as follows:
Definition of a Prohibited Firearm
The Criminal Code states that a prohibited firearm is:
•a handgun with a barrel length of 105 mm or less;
•a handgun designed or adapted to discharge 25 or 32 calibre ammunition;
•a rifle or shotgun that has been altered to make it less than 660 mm (26 inches) in overall length;
•a rifle or shotgun that has been altered to make the barrel length less than 457 mm (18 inches) where the overall firearm length is 660 mm (26 inches) or more;
•an automatic firearm and a converted automatic firearm;
•any firearm prescribed as prohibited.
If you read this carefully, it states that any alteration to a rifle or shotgun that leads to the barrel being less than 18" (restricted) classifies the firearm as prohibited.
Based on what I see here, shortening an existing finished barrel or furinshing one from a blank constitutes an alteration to an existing rifle or shotgun. There doesn't appear to be a free pass here for custom barrel lengths less than 18" made from barrel blanks.
I know it's a commonly held "opinion" here on this site that as long as the finished barrel is manufactured from a barrel blank and not a cut down manufactured barrel, then it is permissable to use a length less than 18.5" while maintaining a non-restricted status.
However, what basis in actual law exists for one to come to that conclusion? I can't find information that would support this.
The legal definition of a prohibited firearm is as follows:
Definition of a Prohibited Firearm
The Criminal Code states that a prohibited firearm is:
•a handgun with a barrel length of 105 mm or less;
•a handgun designed or adapted to discharge 25 or 32 calibre ammunition;
•a rifle or shotgun that has been altered to make it less than 660 mm (26 inches) in overall length;
•a rifle or shotgun that has been altered to make the barrel length less than 457 mm (18 inches) where the overall firearm length is 660 mm (26 inches) or more;
•an automatic firearm and a converted automatic firearm;
•any firearm prescribed as prohibited.
If you read this carefully, it states that any alteration to a rifle or shotgun that leads to the barrel being less than 18" (restricted) classifies the firearm as prohibited.
Based on what I see here, shortening an existing finished barrel or furinshing one from a blank constitutes an alteration to an existing rifle or shotgun. There doesn't appear to be a free pass here for custom barrel lengths less than 18" made from barrel blanks.