Barrel length

At some point barrel length will reduce velocity with any given calibre. As powder is reduced, the nearer to the chamber the peak will be. That's why the link I provided shows the 204 Ruger being optimum at 23" with the bullets they tested.
 
Last edited:
Levi Garrett said:
I tested .308 match rounds , handloads , from 26 and 22 inch barrels, 120 fps differance at the muzzle;) 2 differant guns but what the hay eh!:)
Frank
Two different guns = 2 different chambers, 2 different throats, two different a hell of a lot of stuff. It would be hard to come up with a fair test without taking a full length barrel and cutting it off and re-testing.
Seems to me there was an article with just such a test in I think Rifle magazine a while back.
 
Two different guns = 2 different chambers, 2 different throats, two different a hell of a lot of stuff. It would be hard to come up with a fair test without taking a full length barrel and cutting it off and re-testing.
Seems to me there was an article with just such a test in I think Rifle magazine a while back.
I know , was gonna cut it, but forgot the saw:D
Frank
 
Shorter and thicker bbl means less vibration which gives better accuracy.
If we can sacrifice some velocity and find powder which will burn near 100% at the length of our shorter bbl we may have a winner.
 
Back
Top Bottom