Barrel Torque

Status
Not open for further replies.
With Class 3 threads,
I have several 700's & Barnard P's switch barrel rifles.
Threads cleaned w/acetone.
Threads lubed w/ moly engine assemble lube.
Barrel threaded into receiver & snapped into position (last 1/16th of turn to receiver).
A 3x5 card is wrapped around the barrel & a 12" strap wrench is bumped w/ the heal of my hand to torque it.
Barrel removal is with the 3x5 card & strap wrench.bump..un-thread..done.
I know more than a few Fclass and PRS shooters that use the same style of "torque system " and they have no issues with loose barrels- and regularly place high up in big name matches for that matter !
Cat
 
Last edited:
Obviously we are not gunsmiths but know some competent ones and 220-280ft-lbs must be a joke and using loctite is ill-advised. Many that we have spoken with use 65 in-lbs and anti-seize compound.

Thanks for advise.

Regards,
Peter
I torque my customs to 65lbs with thread lube/anti seize. 👍
 
I just looked at Stolle's website, they suggest 100 ft/lbs for their Panda action. I sure hope my buddy's 6.5 CM barrel doesn't fall off his F-Class gun because I only screwed it on to 65 ft/lbs. It is set up to zero headspace at 65 ft/lbs, at 100 ft/lbs it might end up -.001-.002 headspace.
 
Just in from Bartlein: "There is no specific torque that we do, we just use whatever is the actions manufacturers recommended torque when installing."
 
500 ft-lbs is silly. The axle nuts on a typical car are around 150 - ever tried to loosen one? At 500 ft-lbs there exists the risk of permanently distorting the action, or inducing very high levels of stress at the barrel receiver interface. Combine this with the stresses of shooting, and you are potentially looking at a bomb. Perhaps they meant 500 inch-lbs....
 
500 ft-lbs is silly. The axle nuts on a typical car are around 150 - ever tried to loosen one? At 500 ft-lbs there exists the risk of permanently distorting the action, or inducing very high levels of stress at the barrel receiver interface. Combine this with the stresses of shooting, and you are potentially looking at a bomb. Perhaps they meant 500 inch-lbs....
Not with a modified buttress thread there doesn’t. Critical fasteners in the same diameter range are routinely torqued to over 1000ft/lbs, and that’s with as standard 60° thread form.
 
Tok - I appreciate your comment. When the application requires it, say flange bolts on very high pressure piping, large amounts of fastener torque are required to load the gasket. This is calculated by engineers (I have done it), and bolt material of very high grade (eg SA-193-B16) is used. The bolts are tightened very precisely using hydraulic actuated wrenches.
However, the Tac-Ord website talks about Rem 700 actions, and Krieger barrels with presumably standard threads. I cant possibly see the upside to torquing to 500 ft-lbs.
 
Last edited:
Tok - I appreciate your comment. When the application requires it, say flange bolts on very high pressure piping, large amounts of fastener torque are required to load the gasket. This is calculated by engineers (I have done it), and bolt material of very high grade (eg SA-193-B16) is used. The bolts are tightened very precisely using hydraulic actuated wrenches.
However, the Tac-Ord website talks about Rem 700 actions, and Krieger barrels with presumably standard threads. I cant possibly see the upside to torquing to 500 ft-lbs.
They are not standard threads. I told you that. Just like I told you bubba torques them north of 500ft/lbs. You don’t have to believe it. That doesn’t make it false. The rifles do what they do repeatably, like nothing else available. Those are only two of many ingredients in Mike’s secret sauce.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom