Barrett Fieldcraft .308, my impressions

MarkJnK

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
81   0   0
Location
Ontario
A couple months ago I posted a review of my new lightweight deer rifle, the Kimber Adirondack 6.5 Creedmoor, I was absolutely thrilled with the rifle and had zero regrets. https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/1785209-Kimber-Adirondack-6-5cm-I-m-a-believer?highlight=kimber+believer

BUT, being a bit of a gun nut, it got me looking very hard at other lightweight rifles, well, maybe lusting is a better word. I came across the new Barrett Fieldcraft .308 with 22" bbl on the Precision Optics website. After chatting with Omer about it, and doing some online research, it became obvious this rifle had no apparent down-sides. It was built following the style of Forbes ultra light rifles, but with Barrett production quality and attention to detail. Omer, as usual, was amazing at getting the gun in my hands (although I did get bitten by the Canada Post strike which led to a painfully long delay from BC to Ontario).

Once in my hands, I could quickly see how precise and flawless Barrett builds their firearms. It looked more like a medical instrument in how well it was machined and finished. ZERO tool marks or sharp edges, everything just perfectly radiused, the fit of the stock is beyond comparison, with not even a detectable gap anywhere between the action and Carbon Fibre stock. The bolt is fluted and glides with buttery Tikka/Sako like fashion. The safety has the perfect tension, and feels so substantial and solid. The Timney trigger is perfect as you would expect, breaking like glass around 3-3.5lbs. I couldn't find a single flaw.

What really impressed me was the fit of the stock. I've read alot of articles about Melvin Forbes stocks and the ergonomics he created with his rifles. I don't know how closely Barrett followed his design, but the rifle shoulders and comes up to the eye with amazingly natural fluidity. The cheek rest is perfect and with medium Talley rings and a Leupold VX3i 3.5-10x40 scope, my eye lines up behind this rifle with lightning fast ease. My Kimber is great in this regard also, but the Barrett just takes it up a notch. All together, the rifle and scope tip the scales just a hair under 6lbs. My rifle is #938 and came with a coupon for free Talley Lightweight rings from Barrett.

At the range is where the gun really shines. I took 4 different ammos with me. All 4 shot well, 1.5" and under even with the cheapest Federal blue box ammo. So far, the best ammo (that I had with me) was Hornady Whitetail Hunter 165gn which shot consistently under an inch, my best being .58" for a 3 shot group. I did notice that the apparent stress relieving that Barrett does to these barrels help eliminate or reduce heat-induced stringing. I noticed very little walking of shots as I continued to shoot without cooling the barrel. I was also impressed at how the recoil was not nearly as strong as I had expected from a sub 6lb .308. It has recoil, no doubt, but very tolerable and somehow muted, maybe through the carbon Fiber stock.

You are probably wondering Barrett vs Kimber... which do I prefer? I'm not sure I can answer that yet, too close to call although I'm leaning towards the Barrett. Somehow the Barrett feels more solid in the hand, the fully bedded barrel, perfectly shaped bolt handle, and well made safety makes the gun feel rock solid in all the tactile ways you use a gun. The Kimber's safety, while functional, seems like it isn't built as solid as it should be, the bolt is not as smooth or solid feeling as it has more moving parts, and the slight flex you feel between the barrel and stock forend add up to a feeling of being less solid than the Barrett. Its all subjective and tactile and has no bearing on performance or accuracy, as both guns are shooters. I do wish the Barrett was threaded to add a sleek brake like the Kimber has.

If you are looking for a lightweight hunter, look no further than the Barrett (or Kimber for that matter).

Once again, Precision Optics and Omer hit it out of the park and provided amazing service and advice. Thanks again.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/i2T9VxQKtPEoeK268
 
Last edited:
Looks like a winner! Thanks for taking the time to post the review,I’ve been thinking of getting one myself as I sold my NULA a couple years back and miss how well that stock fit me.
 
I checked Precision Optics website a few day ago and was reading up on that rifle. I already have a Kimber MA but that Barrett sure looks nice, I would like one in 6.5 Creedmoor. Thanks for the review.
 
Thank you for taking the time to publish your review Mark!

The Fieldcraft rifles are pretty breathtaking to behold, and hold. The fit and finish rivals any production rifle I've seen.

Here is hoping that the importer/distributor brings in more for 2019 as these rifles will only gain in popularity.

Cheers,

Omer
 
I would be curious to do a side by side comparison between the Barrett and the short lived Forbes that preceded it. I have a Forbes 20B in 7mm-08 and love it, shoots well and when hunting hits what you point it at. Just seem to line up perfectly when shouldered. There was a lot of internet haters but I’m very satisfied and they were considerably cheaper than a NULA or the current Fieldcraft.
 
I would be curious to do a side by side comparison between the Barrett and the short lived Forbes that preceded it. I have a Forbes 20B in 7mm-08 and love it, shoots well and when hunting hits what you point it at. Just seem to line up perfectly when shouldered. There was a lot of internet haters but I’m very satisfied and they were considerably cheaper than a NULA or the current Fieldcraft.

From what I read the Forbes branded rifles were plagued by very poor fit and finish but shot good or great. The Barrett couldn't be further from that. The Barrett is as tight in fit and finish as a rifle could get. Hard to describe without holding one in your hand. Mine shoots well within expectations (which were high). I thought my Kimber fit me perfectly, and was going to be nearly impossible to improve on. When the Barrett arrived, i firstly thought it was not as good fitting as the Kimber because it was different, but as I kept shouldering it, playing with it and shooting it, it became clear that the Barrett is in fact a better shouldering rifle for me by a slight margin. The Kimber and Barrett have similar LOP, but the grip on the Kimber is more swept back giving the feeling of a shorter LOP. The Barrett has a more vertical grip closer to the trigger so it feels like a longer LOP at first, but melts into you once you get used to it. FWIW, I'm 5'8" with normal proportions, heavier build.
 
I’m quite sure that is the difference, as apparently Mr. Forbes wasn’t to happy with QC.Mine is a low serial number and I’ve read where he was involved at the start of production. I guess I got lucky but like you’ve said you almost have to feel them in use to totally appreciate the design. At 6lbs scoped and loaded they sure are a joy to carry while hunting.
 
quite likely out of my budget for a rifle ( i dont even want to look because i will be sad ) but what a beautiful looking rifle. its always pleasing when beauty and functionality meet. i hope you enjoy hunting with it.
 
I recently came across these rifles too. If they become available again in the next few months it's going to be quite a decision for me between the Barrett and the kimber.
 
Considering what a factory Sako costs with a plastic stock, OEM trigger and limited scope mounting options, these are actually quite reasonable. Would love to see one in person,

Patrick
 
Considering what a factory Sako costs with a plastic stock, OEM trigger and limited scope mounting options, these are actually quite reasonable. Would love to see one in person,

Patrick

So true. I paid $1500 for a 30-06 Sako A7 Roughtech. And then spent a couple hundred to replace all the plastic bits with Aluminum. Its a nice gun with a nice feeling plastic stock (with alloy skeleton and bedding), but comes in almost 3 lbs heavier. In hindsight I would have bought the Barrett if it were available at the time.
 
Back
Top Bottom