if a person sprays the bear but it keeps comeing the time he wasted dicking around with the spray he coulda be more prepared by haveing his shotgun or rifle ready and you know 12 ga slugs slow em down if ya hit em there gona feel it! or a 45 70
Like i said - if you're holding a gun, go for the gun
But if you're gun is 5 feet away and the bear is charging, you won't make it. You might get the spray from a belt holder tho.
this is a misleading statistic, IMO.
the bear spray incidents are all counted, even when a summer forestry or geology student empties a can of spray at a 100 lb blackie running full tilt away from him.
Up to a point perhaps. Considering the effective range of spray, i suspect in most cases the bear was well inside people's 'comfort zone' tho.
I do know what you're saying - a guy has a bear 'too close' - lets off a blast, and the noise and red cloud billowing forwards startles the bear and it runs off. Counts as 'successful defense'. Guy number two has a rifle, and yells at the bear instead, and the bear runs off. Doesn't get recorded as a 'successful gun defense'. In neither case the effectiveness of the tool was not an issue, it was more to do with the fact the bear was easily scared off (as are most).
However, several researchers have put together numbers from specific cases where they could reasonably identify it as an honest to goodness 'hostile' bear. And the numbers are still quite high.
I agree with you it would be wrong to take this as ipso facto proof bear spray is more effective than guns. For example - it might just be that a lot of the guys with guns never practiced with them, whereas bear spray is EASIER to use correctly with minimal practice. It may also be that in many cases the person was using a hunting gun not intended for bear defense, and factors such as a scope reduced it's effectiveness close in.
It might even be that different people find that one or the other is more effective for THEM - if it were possible to have 10 times to try it different ways
You can't take the numbers as absolute markers for effectiveness because as you say it's not apples to apples. But - there is little doubt that bear spray used properly is effective in the majority of cases, and therefore makes a good addition to your arsenal where appropriate.
I just didn't want people to read this thread and think there was no point in carrying spray - especially when a gun is either not allowed or is going to be put down a lot.
It is an effective tool when used properly. Would i rather have a big honkin' gun that i'd been practicing with? Sure. But that's not always possible.