Bears leg in 44 mag

But doesn't the 25" OAL make it a restricted rifle? Even if it's not a pistol, this would be a range toy only.

Here's hoping it gets imported with an SBR stock. I'd definitely get a 14" 45-70 from Henry for up country hunts.
No. It doesn't go below 26" via "folding, telescoping, or otherwise". For manual actions, fixed stock = 26" OAL rule does not apply. This should be common knowledge by now.

Plenty Mare's Leg with 23"-24" OALs out there that are non-restricted.
 
The magazine capacity is not that great, it's listed as 4 for both .357 and .44mag, 3 rounds for the rifle calibres.

The Rossi Ranchhand 92's with their shorter barrel (12inches vs 13.8 inches) takes 6 rounds in the magazine.
 
The magazine capacity is not that great, it's listed as 4 for both .357 and .44mag, 3 rounds for the rifle calibres.

The Rossi Ranchhand 92's with their shorter barrel (12inches vs 13.8 inches) takes 6 rounds in the magazine.
That's an interesting observation. Even Henry's mares leg with a 12.9" barrel lists a 5 round capacity. I wonder why the bears leg is so limited.
 
I see North Sylva just posted in stock Henry’s but no bears leg🙁 it would be nice for them to respond when customers ask questions.
Maybe I will check with irunguns instead.
 
I see North Sylva just posted in stock Henry’s but no bears leg🙁 it would be nice for them to respond when customers ask questions.
Maybe I will check with irunguns instead.

North Sylva is what it is.... kind of like Trump.
IRG will likely be the quicker option. Which caliber are you thinking of?
 
The only think I can think of is the action design is longer and less efficient space wise.
Making things even more odd, the 16.5" H12 Protector (should be the same action) is listed as holding 7. How does 2.7" of barrel get you 3 more rounds, when 44mag has an OAL of 1.61"?

Peculiar.
 
Back
Top Bottom