belt fed ar15 ?

I would presume so. It meets all criteria. Then again this is the government we are talking about. Don't forget that anything they decide to be prohibited, shall be. There are no guarantees in this "lovely" nation of ours.

TDC
 
Humm but belt is NOT magazine, it is NOT a device that can be prohebited ?? or restricted ??

On MG-34, the belt can ba as long as you whant no ?? I have seen someone at the range with it, the belt was holding about 50 round and the owner told me it is even not restricted... And i think but not sure it is the sams for the owners of Browning M2 50mbg in semi auto ??

Sendero
 
You can have your belts as long as you like, capacity is not restricted by law.

Wouldn;t that be sweet if it were available as an upper for export? :D
 
Last edited:
An exerpt fron a promotional film I have re. the ar10(1957)
The back-pack belt fed AR... Kewl:cool:

 
There has been no real answer on whether linked ammo constitutes a belt. So for now most consider it one. Thus if designed after 1945 it's 5 rounds.
 
buy yourself a lm7 and you can have as many as you would like!
It does not look like we will ever be able to get the am180, as they will not sell to individuals unless they have a registered m16 lower.. the am fires from an open bolt that requires the auto sear hole . So even if you could get one here you would have to find a lower with the auto sear hole and then get some colt lmg trigger parts.. If that does not break any laws, it would be very difficult to get that combination together..
I thought that someone in Medicine Hat was suppose to have a shrike????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom