Benefits of synthetic stocks

mistahmojoryan

Regular
Rating - 100%
56   0   0
Location
Regina
As much as I like wood stocks I've been considering putting a synthetic stock on one rifle (Sako 75/300WM). The "upgrade" will run me about $500 (before a bedding job) so I was hoping the synthetic stock proponents could tell me why it's worth my while. :) Thanks!
 
For that price, I am not sure I would find it a gain to make the switch. You don't have to worry about warping or scratches, but wood tends to be stiffer. You will have to decide if 500 plus a bedding job is worth it.
 
It burns better than wood in an emergency :p
Moisture not a factor for one, still needs bedding.
lighter, and you don't feel bad painting it. :D
Would never ever remove walnut for a plastic stock !!!!!! wood needs bedding to.
 
Just my opinon mind you ... but are you nucking futs?:D
Gawd I just hate synthetics. Just my opinon.

Good luck in whatever you decide... excuse me while I throw up:p


Cheers
Just another old man watching the pigs fly by
 
Last edited:
Synthetic or Fiberglass, there is a difference dont you know.
Synthetic come in many styles and types. There are the injected molded tupperware variety, which usually are so flimsy in the forend you have to rest them on the front action screw to get any accuracy out of them, Then there are the composite molded stocks like Carbilite, they are often heavier than your wood stock, but very durable and the like.
Then comes the fiberglass stocks or Fiberglass kevlar blend stocks, these stocks are the real light weights, and dont have the hollow sounding butt like many of the synthetics, they are difficult to get a good paint job on but it can be done.
So I guess if you want to save weight the fiber or kevlar stocks are the number but if you want stability and durability I would personally lean to the many good laminate stocks on the market.
 
I dont mind sythetic stock, I am rough with my guns and they hold up just great. I have one rifle I use for deer hunting that has a wood stock, and no matter how careful I am I always put a scratch/gouge in it every year.
 
Rotaxpower said:
I dont mind sythetic stock, I am rough with my guns and they hold up just great. I have one rifle I use for deer hunting that has a wood stock, and no matter how careful I am I always put a scratch/gouge in it every year.
Well put. I am fairly easy on guns, but I know some people who would freak out and snap if forbid they put a scratch on the walnut stock. I personally dont mind synthetic at all.
 
A quality synthetic like a mcmillan is the most stable stock available in changing climatic conditions.Unlike wood,it won't warp or swell reguardless of the humidity.It is also extremely strong, as mcmillan is the only company that I know of that offers a lifetime warranty against breakage.Another advantage is if you scratch it,you simply touch it up with paint and it is as good as new.I have mcmillans on all of my hunting rifles and have never regretted buying them.
 
I've got Mcmillan and Brown. Both excellent, similar quallity. I also like Walnut, seal it properly in and out and you'll probably be good. On serious pack in or other long duration hunts synthetics make the most sense.
 
I believe Bansner also warranties their stocks for life.
Synthetics have their place, but they are colder on the hands below freezing. I have no use for a cheap synthetic "tupperware" stock though.
 
I love the look and feel of wood, but to me synthetics are far more practical. Where I live, it is either cold and wet, or cold and dry. When it's not cold then the humidity climbs up to 100%, and there have been days here where you could get heat stroke at lunch time, and have snow by mid afternoon. Therefore, the first advantage of the synthetic stock is that it is not prone to warping and suffering the shifting POI this causes. Some say that synthetic stocks are ugly, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. All sorts of patterns can be painted onto a synthetic stock, and this only detracts from a stock’s appearance when one tries to make a synthetic stock look like wood. I have not found synthetics to be lighter. Interestingly enough all of my rifles got heavier with the addition of glass (not cheap plastic) stocks. The synthetic stock is far more resilient than wood. If solvent or oil runs into the inletting of a wood stock, it becomes soft and punky. When I bring a synthetic stocked rifle inside on a cold day, and it begins to sweat and ice up, I can spray it down with WD-40 without undue concern. Some wood is very strong and stable, but as it ages it will split and crack. Any wood stock can be damaged from the impact of being dropped. It is much easier to repair minor blemishes from bangs and dings on a synthetic stock than on a wood stock, although wood compressions can be easily ironed out. The fact that you are considering spending $500.00 on a synthetic stock means that you are interested in owning a high quality product. While $500.00 is not an inconsiderable amount, it will no longer buy you a high quality wood stock, in fact you could pay that for just the blank. Therefore not only are synthetic stocks stable, handsome, and tough they are also affordable. If this isn't enough, while a wood stock can be reduced in size quite easily for custom purposes, it is not so easy to add material to it and keep the wood’s good looks. Where as with a synthetic stock, if you wished to raise the comb of your stock to say accommodate large optics, a bit of bondo, some shaping and finishing and you're good to go.

There are some rifles which I believe would be out of place with synthetic furniture - such as lever action carbines and rifles from Winchester and Marlin, Ruger #1's should have wood stocks, and historical pieces should not be modernized. But the modern hunting rifle benefits from a modern stock.
 
I'm looking at McMillan stocks...they seem to get excellent reviews. I know there are other quality manufacturers but McMillan has a good reputation and good selection. Better quality than a factory Sako stock as well, I think.

Lots of good feedback; thanks!
 
mistahmojoryan said:
I'm looking at McMillan stocks...they seem to get excellent reviews. I know there are other quality manufacturers but McMillan has a good reputation and good selection. Better quality than a factory Sako stock as well, I think.

Lots of good feedback; thanks!


Amcmillans are very good, as are Bansner. I have both, as well as a Bel & Carlson stock on my Ruger 7RM. I prefer the Bansner, Macmillan, B&C, in that order.

But to be honest, it's a toss up between the 2 at the top of my list.:)

I'd much rather have a good quality synthetic than any wood stock, especially the crappy wood they put on factory stocks.:)
 
I have owned now Bansner and my new Wildcat Composites. I cant say that I like either one better than the other, but am VERY impressed so far by the Wildcat.

I have handled a few McMillans and have heard good things about them as well. Personally I just dont like wood stocks for the type of hunting I do.....
 
I have both McMillan and B&C. The McMillan are very good, and the B&C is alright, but not up to the McMillan. The B&C is on a M-7 and is a trim little stock, however I had one on a .30-06 that was very clubby. When I put the McMillan on my .375 it gained two pounds over the factory Brno wood stock, which given the caliber is a good thing. When it first came out of the box I was a little disappointed with it's appearance, but it has proven to be a top quality stock and superior to wood in every way. The only suggestion I might have for you - and this hasn't been enough of a problem to bother me - is that the entire McMillan stock has a stippled non slip surface, so when your gunsmith does the bedding work you might want him to smooth out the surface on the cheek piece.
 
Last edited:
A good fibreglass stock is THE ultimate in stocks. They are super stable, very stiff, lightweight, and ultra strong, as well as being easy to touch up and repaint....

My personal favorite are Wildcat composite.

I've owned B+C, HS Precision, Brown Precision, and shot Bansner and McMillan (too heavy for my style).

Stuart at Wildcat would stand behind his products too (last I talked to him he had only one broken stock ever... and buddy rolled a quad on it:eek: ).

280_ACKLEY
 
I like wood a lot better, but only for aesthetic reasons. Practically speaking, a good synth is probably your best bet. I really like the HS Precision stocks - nice and light, great for sporters. I've yet to try a MacMillan, but they're more for the precision shooters where weight is not a concern. Robertson stocks here in Canada look really good (better then the MacM's), but I've not spent any significant amount of time with one
 
where does the laminated stocks fit into this discussion as far as stability,esthetics ,weightand practicality,are concerned?
 
Back
Top Bottom