Issue I had with my 682 Gold E drove me to look at possible backup options.
While browsing, I checked out a 692 at a friend's place, and I have to say, the fit and finish has really declined.
Took a few photos:
The 682 GOLD E:
Now the 692 Sporting:
Notice the bigger gaps and terrible mix matched fit circled in yellow.
And this on the 692:
The bottom of the lever is rubbing against the wood stock.
Just a side note, in some forums I read the trigger groups are interchangeable, but it seems to be a bit different:
682:
692:
And lastly,
692 had a over flow of silver solder on one side of the rib, really small but visible...
And after maybe 250 rounds the ejector selector broke for the bottom barrel:
All in all, not that impressed, especially considering that the 692 cost more than the 682 gold e. It's a trade off between newer features (B-fast stock, Steelium plus barrel, longer chokes, thicker receiver, etc) vs. much better fit and finish.
Hope this helpes anyone who's trying to decide buying a used 682 vs. newer 692.
While browsing, I checked out a 692 at a friend's place, and I have to say, the fit and finish has really declined.
Took a few photos:
The 682 GOLD E:

Now the 692 Sporting:

Notice the bigger gaps and terrible mix matched fit circled in yellow.
And this on the 692:

The bottom of the lever is rubbing against the wood stock.
Just a side note, in some forums I read the trigger groups are interchangeable, but it seems to be a bit different:
682:

692:

And lastly,
692 had a over flow of silver solder on one side of the rib, really small but visible...

And after maybe 250 rounds the ejector selector broke for the bottom barrel:


All in all, not that impressed, especially considering that the 692 cost more than the 682 gold e. It's a trade off between newer features (B-fast stock, Steelium plus barrel, longer chokes, thicker receiver, etc) vs. much better fit and finish.
Hope this helpes anyone who's trying to decide buying a used 682 vs. newer 692.
Last edited: