Best Civil War Revolver?

Thank Drm. I have the secondary .36 cal revolvers as well, the 51 Colts and 62 police handle much better than the .44 cal guns. The Manhattan is one of my favorites. I would like revolvers in the higher quality like you seem to find tho. Finish costs more. :(
 
I bought this Starr D/A Army revolver back in 1972---I wish that all of my CW revolvers retained this much original finish. I have always admired the M1863 Starr S/A Army revolver but I have never owned one.





Two very crisp grip cartouches of 'BH' for Benjamin Hannis--U.S. Armory sub-inspector.





I would be very curious to know if there are other Remington-Rider D/A ‘fluted cylinder’ New Model Belt Revolvers in Canada.
The fluted cylinder version was manufactured 1863-65 with three digit serial numbers----production was in the hundreds for this model. (According to the experts.)

A comment out of Reilly’s Book ‘United States Military Small Arms 1816-1865’ regarding these revolvers;

“Double-action revolvers were not readily accepted during the percussion era, and few such arms were manufactured in large numbers. Some of these Remington arms, however, undoubtedly saw service during the Civil War, although none were purchased officially under government contract.”





I don't usually take my Civil War collection revolvers (partially) apart to verify serial numbers---but I did with this revolver---this is what I found.

819 on the trigger guard tab and barrel.



819 on the left frame.



819 marked in pencil on the left grip panel.



The barrel address on these revolvers is;
MANUFACTURED BY REMINGTONS’, ILION, N.Y. / RIDER’S PT. AUG.17, 1858, MAY 3, 1859
 
Last edited:
Manhattan Navy

Thank Drm. I have the secondary .36 cal revolvers as well, the 51 Colts and 62 police handle much better than the .44 cal guns. The Manhattan is one of my favorites. I would like revolvers in the higher quality like you seem to find tho. Finish costs more. :(

The Manhattan Navy is my favourite revolver of the Civil War period.

They are as well made, if not better, and as finely finished as the Colt revolvers of the same period.

The cylinder safety is an improvement over the Colt design and the spring plate helped to keep the caps on the nipples so they don’t fall into the action and lock it up.

When the Manhattan Navy was introduced, Colt did not have a .36 cal revolver on a frame smaller than the 1851 Colt Navy.

On the Manhattan there are 5 banknote quality, roll engraved panels on the cylinder depicting various battle scenes that are much finer detailed than the one battle scene found.on the Colt Navy, or any other revolvers of the period.

Regards,
Powderman
 
Last edited:
Sorry wrenchgod,

Tried to post pics by dragging them into the post, which you are supposed to be able to do as a CGN Member, but I was unable to post photos from my computer that way and had to go through the dreaded Photobucket instead. I deleted unsuccessful photo attempt.

I am unfamiliar with Howell cylinders.

If anyone knows how to post pics from a computer without going through a hosting site, please educate me. Thanks.

Regards


Cool, so the new Howell cylinders copied the safety from that one.

Edit. Thanks powderman, you deleted that and it looks like I'm talking to my self LOL
 
Sorry wrenchgod,

Tried to post pics by dragging them into the post, which you are supposed to be able to do as a CGN Member, but I was unable to post photos from my computer that way and had to go through the dreaded Photobucket instead. I deleted unsuccessful photo attempt.

I am unfamiliar with Howell cylinders.

If anyone knows how to post pics from a computer without going through a hosting site, please educate me. Thanks.

Regards

No worries, I just learned myself. LOL You have to go to Advanced then place the cursor in the spot you want the picture and in the top bar you will see a Insert Picture, click on it and it will give you the option to upload from computer or enter URL.

View attachment 78087

View attachment 78088
 
My vote would be the Remington-hands down with the strongest frame IMHO- the Starr was great to reload with a spare cylinder, however if you dropped the knurled screw holding it all together you had a useless piece of iron in your hand.

I forgot to replace the screw one time and shot 6 shots without the frame opening.. It wasnt until afterwards that I noticed that I had the screw in my pocket....oops
 
I enjoy reading about Quantrill and his band of gurilla freedom fighters.
They overwhelmingly preferred 1860 colt army's
They usually carried 4 of them when mounted.
 
The Remington, because it is a solid frame design, easy to remove the cylinder, and in .44.

The 1860 Colt, because it has a cylinder arbor that reduces cylinder drag from fouling quite well, has excellent handling qualities, and in .44.

Starr double-actions were quite fragile internally.
 
Back
Top Bottom