Best Shell for Skeet

chuffer

New member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
montreal
Good Afternoon,

Just starting skeet and using a Remington o/u and love it

What do you all suggest for shells?
I was using 2 3/8 #7.5 then tried 8 and liked them moire
What about these the price seems right

Sellier & Bellot 12 Ga Sport Clay Target Load 2-3/4″ #8​

 
I shoot Federal Top gun, Winchester super target, Challenger, Clever, Score or whatever I can get the best price on 1 oz or 1 1/8 oz usually #8 shot, I shoot 8,000 + per year so cost is the main driver
 
The o/u is a great gun because there aren't as fussy with ammo as semi's are.

I'd stick to #8 and 9's and more 9's if you can get them because if you want to start shooting competitions even small events some clubs have a shot size restrictions of #9 only.
 
I usually run Challenger light load #8 in 12 ga. for skeet and sporting clays. If I am shooting a 20 ga. Top Gun #8 is my go to. Both cost the same where I but my shells, $119/flat plus taxes.
 
Somewhere on Trapshooters.com they ran the math of the target speed vs the shot velocity and decided that the target was going so slow compared to the shot that it didn't matter what type of shells you were shooting. I have also seen the point made that unless you were shooting 100s most of the time and wanted to shoot 100s all the time then shot shell type didn't matter. That was trap but I imagine skeet would be much the same. Buy the cheapest shells you can buy and shoot lots.
 
Skeet targets are close - maximum 21 yards. #9 gives the most pellets and has plenty of energy to break targets.
Using #7 1/2 is handicapping yourself.
Using 1145 fps loads will give less recoil.
I shoot primarily 28 gauge and 410, so I load #9 exclusively. I want every pellet that I can get , and #9 break targets just fine at skeet distances. Yes we do find an unbroken target with one hole in it now and then, but that happens with #7-1/2, and #8, as well as with #9.
 
Which, begs another question.
Why isn’t Challenger cheaper than Federal when they are ‘locally made’?

Are prices artificially equalized?

Or, does more expensive Canadian manufacturing eventually just end up costing the same as a US manufactured shell?
 
Which, begs another question.
Why isn’t Challenger cheaper than Federal when they are ‘locally made’?

Are prices artificially equalized?

Or, does more expensive Canadian manufacturing eventually just end up costing the same as a US manufactured shell?
Raw materials cost, powder, primers and shot
 
I shot in Arizona last spring and the club there was selling Nobel Sport Italia shells for 7 dollars a box which worked out to just under $10 bucks cdn at the time. For comparison AA shells were $12 usd at the same club and I'm not saying the Nobel's are a premium shell like the AA but they did seem to work just fine..
I've never seen those shells around here and I wonder why no one has brought them in, they'd sell like hotcakes for that price.
 
Back
Top Bottom