Agreed....I support a similar quote that says once you hit 2700fps ...if you want more power - add bullet weight not velocity.I saw a quote somewhere, maybe here on CGN, that said: Velocity drops off, Mass doesnt.
Hmmm. I don't like it...
While a dowel absolutely does a better job of simulating a branch, it does a terrible job of allowing an even comparison between tests. The infinite angles of the dowel's radius makes it all but impossible to replicate the same amount of deflection twice. If you hit a 1 inch wooden dowel an 1/8 inch right of center, the deflection angle would be 45 degrees. Another 1/4 of an inch to the right and the deflection is 135 degrees. That's a change of 1 degree of deflection for every 2.1 thousands of an inch you miss the aiming point by. I can assure you that I'M not good enough to do that test.
The angled flat board, while nothing like a twig, would at least provide even, repeatable deflection to each and every shot.
I saw a quote somewhere, maybe here on CGN, that said: Velocity drops off, Mass doesnt.
Use small, light, fast and soft bullets on small, light, fast and soft animals.
Use big, heavy, slow and hard bullets on big, heavy, slow and hard animals.
Here is a curious question I have. Shooting my 223 last weekend at the range. Was checking the zero on my Aimpoint after having removed it and reinstalling it. I had some American Eagle 55gr FMJ and Hornady 55gr HP. Both boxes indicated identical MV. I sighted in for use with the Hornady 55gr HP as they are my primary go to round when I am out looking for critters. The American Eagle FMJ's are just a toy around load for plinking with at the range now and again. What I notice each time I shoot both at the range is that the FMJ's seem to kick up alot more earth from the berm behind the target board upon impact than the HP's? I have also noticed this when experimenting with them in a pasture on gophers seeing the size of the dust cloud coming from the gopher's earth mound. Would this be due to the design of the FMJ bullet penetrating the ground deeper? I would have thought personally the energy transferrance from a bullet like the HP exploding upon inpact would have been greater than the more stoutly built FMJ?
Hmmm. I don't like it...
While a dowel absolutely does a better job of simulating a branch, it does a terrible job of allowing an even comparison between tests. The infinite angles of the dowel's radius makes it all but impossible to replicate the same amount of deflection twice. If you hit a 1 inch wooden dowel an 1/8 inch right of center, the deflection angle would be 45 degrees. Another 1/4 of an inch to the right and the deflection is 135 degrees. That's a change of 1 degree of deflection for every 2.1 thousands of an inch you miss the aiming point by. I can assure you that I'M not good enough to do that test.
The angled flat board, while nothing like a twig, would at least provide even, repeatable deflection to each and every shot.
They may both work, but I prefer heavier and slower...
Here's a version you can look at: http://www.theboxotruth.com/the-box-o-truth-40-deflected-bullets-and-the-box-o-truth/
I like big and slow for less meat damage. Plus I am big and slow...
Use small, light, fast and soft bullets on small, light, fast and soft animals.
Use big, heavy, slow and hard bullets on big, heavy, slow and hard animals.
mostly true but there is so many variables, I have watched .243 and 7mm drill tiny holes in deer and watched them take off, also watched a 30/30 drop one on the spot .




























