Really surprising just how many still believe that some calibers and their bullets will plow through brush rather than deflect off branches.
I can tell you from my first hand experience that physically I am big, heavy and slow and I cannot get through the branches and leaves near as easily as the small, light and speedy guys!! That lays this argument to rest!!![]()
Given those criteria Spank you win hands down...........our Pygmy tracker went through the Congo bush like it wasn't there I however struggled with nearly every step........branches, vines, bushes, some plant with leaves the size of bath towels.........They had to machete me a hallway through this stuff, but whenever our Pygmy decided he would just silently disappear.........small and light definitely goes through the bush much better. You should have watched all our trackers disappear, for hours after we walked into the middle of a small herd of them nasty little forest elephants.......what had been a cheery bunch with 3 black faces and 3 white faces became only 3 white faces in a New York minute..........
There are 2 old sayings about the 45/70.
You can eat right up to the hole.
There's no cover from buffalo hunters. Aka (#$#$ that tree, i'm going to shoot right through it).
I had no idea buffalo hunters ate the other hole!!! Sick buggers.....
I saw a quote somewhere, maybe here on CGN, that said: Velocity drops off, Mass doesnt.
The reason for using a heavier bullet on big animals eg; moose is they have a hollow or larger hair and small calibers tend to spin out in the hair - no entry wounds
On windy days I hunt with Slow and heavy and Keep shoots under 150 yards
On open land and good weather speed rules
I'm curious why you shoot slow and heavy on windy days? You're not alone, a lot of folks talk about bucking the wind with big slow bullets, but any old ballistic chart will clearly show that speed is the only thing that prevents excessive drift. A .270 or 25-06 in a 10mph crosswind will drift 1.5 inches at your 150 yards. A 45-70 will drift 6 inches.
Am I missing something? Why is slow and heavy better for wind?
Use small, light, fast and soft bullets on small, light, fast and soft animals.
Use big, heavy, slow and hard bullets on big, heavy, slow and hard animals.
I saw a quote somewhere, maybe here on CGN, that said: Velocity drops off, Mass doesnt.
Being on the Haida Gwaii we see sum of the Worse Wind on the BC coast
Late fall and winter is wen we hunt it not uncommon to see 200mile winds
The stronger the win the closer you have to get thers no Long range hunting in a strong wind
At Close range slow and heavy will out perform the fastest magnum
I have bin hearing some good things about some of the new bullets being able to perform at both short and long distance but haven't seen it for my salf
I have nothing against the flat shooting magnums and understand the need for them but thers a need for the fat slow moving girls to haha
I am completely confident in one of 3 things: That you have never hunted in 200mph winds, that "200" is a typo, or that you have had one too many wobbly pops. Or perhaps all 3.
Regardless, even in very high winds, a faster bullet still drifts less than fat and slow. For giggles, in 200mph winds, a .270 will drift 31 inches at 150 yards. The 45-70 will drift 130 inches.
So where does this common belief come from? There must be some reason folks believe this...
I
I don't hunt in 200mph winds but I do hunt in sum big winds last deer I got was bedded down hiding from the wind gust up to 60km and raining like a basters
Most moose I have gotten wear bedded down as well I just can't see how fast flat shooting magnum will open up at 25 yards don't get me wrong I have a 6.5CM I realy like but I realy like my 44mag both are grait deer rounds and in a pinch I would use both on moose so I'm on the fence on this debate
Ther is no question the flat shooting magnums and the fat girls both work and it gets more intersting as we dig into it more




























