Bigfoot ... ???

Status
Not open for further replies.
Subspecies right?


Nothing 7' feet tall and hairy? Just insects and subspecies.... I already said that's all that is left lol
 
Cleftwynd said:
Subspecies right?


Nothing 7' feet tall and hairy? Just insects and subspecies.... I already said that's all that is left lol
Click to expand...


Bigfoot would be a primate and therefore a subspecies as well.....

Here is a question for you, if you had to put odds on it, what are the odds that bigfoot exists?.....keeping oin mind there is circumstancial (at best) evidence etc.....
 
The day we start standing firm that possibilities don't exist is the day we stop advancing as an educated species(I use the term educated loosely).




One of the first photos I posted just to bring the thread back on track.




Oh, I think it is time to head over to a 7-08 bullet thread. :)
 
If there was one track in softer sand/gravel, did you take any pics of the rest of the tracks? There had to have been more, especially with something that large and heavy.


Superbrad, I say 0.00000001%, unless you include very tall hairy Italians, then it's 99.99%. I know some from the Toronto area that would intimidate Bigfoot, if Bigfoot existed.
 
Superbrad said:
OK.... we can go back and forth on this all night dude, and I am 3 hours ahead of you time zone wise, so not willing to.... lol
Click to expand...

Nobody has a gun to your head.

But I would like you to provide that link on the DNA from a previously unknown primate. I'm not saying it's not true, because there could be unknown primates some jungle somewhere. I'm just far more skeptical that a very human animal lives in the woods in North America.

Superbrad said:
I don't see where Kelley offered up anything and said it was definitive proof.....
Click to expand...

He says he has hair and claims to know enough about their ### life that it would have taken hours of observation. Either of these things is definitive proof. And I haven't even read the whole thread.

Superbrad said:
it's a fun thread and he is a believer and puts some time into looking.... that's how I see it.....it's fun to read and the idea that it's possible is intriguing and fun.... nothing more or less.....
Click to expand...

It would be fun if he accurately reported what he had. Hair that may be from an "anomalous primate". Maybe some glimpses of something unknown.

Superbrad said:
Also, and not meant as a dig here, wikipedia is about as reliable a source for anything as the national enquirer.... just saying.....
Click to expand...

On it's own, no. But if you doubt something it has to say, then just check the source at the bottom.

Superbrad said:
You err on the side of science... I get that... in science, what cannot be proven does not exist until it is proven, hence where you got the religious reference I won't go back to....

it's all in fun... that is the point.... sometimes there is value in the unknown and unproven.... there were no coelecanths, giant squid etc 20 years ago.... but who knows?...
Click to expand...

Well, no. A Coelacanth was caught in 1938, there's pictures of a giant squid from 1873, and it's a lot easier for stuff to hide in the oceans. A 10ft ape is going to have a far harder time hiding, and wouldn't be able to conceal all his hair, scat, and bones.
 
I still think there's more likelihood of unicorns in Sask, than Big Foot. But maybe when I retire next year, I'll move back next and take up the search.
 
Cleftwynd said:
If there was one track in softer sand/gravel, did you take any pics of the rest of the tracks? There had to have been more, especially with something that large and heavy.


Superbrad, I say 0.00000001%, unless you include very tall hairy Italians, then it's 99.99%. I know some from the Toronto area that would intimidate Bigfoot, if Bigfoot existed.
Click to expand...

so what?.... one in ten million or so?.....

Just so you know, we are on the same page......

but the odds of winning lotto max are 1 in over 28 million..... and yet millions of canadaians hand over their hard earned cash to buy tickets to the point where the lottery is extremely profitable.....

My point is (and not that you didn't get it), it's fun to believe and its fun to have a dream.... and that is what this thread and Kelly's quest is about.....
 
Kelly Timoffee said:
Now I am dishonest? :(

One day the truth with plop itself down right in front of us.

Take the thread for what it is intended.There are many in the legal section who love black and white argument and debate , hell even I enjoy those type of discussions.

Maybe if some of us prefer absolutes you could participate in the "my rifle shoot __ MOA all day long threads" Much more scientific. A target a projectile and a tape measure , of course you may not want to participate if your projectile is ummm, how shall we say, not able to reach the lands. ;)
Click to expand...

Answer honestly please.

Are you claiming to have evidence of the existence of bigfoot, or are you claiming to have evidence that bigfoot may exist?
 
Kelly Timoffee said:
The day we start standing firm that possibilities don't exist is the day we stop advancing as an educated species(I use the term educated loosely).
Click to expand...

Sure. Possible. But you're the one who claims to have a bigfoot hair, not a possible bigfoot hair. And you've made claims about their behavior that are only knowable if they exist and you've watched them extensively. So you're the one claiming absolutes, and I'm saying that claim is dishonest.

Kelly Timoffee said:
One of the first photos I posted just to bring the thread back on track.
Click to expand...
And I don't think that's a footprint at all. There's no edges on the left or bottom, no deep imprint from the heel. (where most of the weight is.) There's no arch. No imprint from the ball. The edge on the "toes" and right side are far too sharp to be from the rounded sides/toes of primate feet. There's no gaps between the toes and the big one isn't round. There's a stick near the heel that would have been pressed into the dirt but it doesn't appear to be. The left side has zero definition, if the ground was consistent, there would be an imprint there.

It does look a little like a footprint, but doesn't hold up to closer examination.
 
http://movie-sounds.org/war-movie-s...-you-really-are-an-uptight-bastard-aren-t-you

Play the sound file. :)




i6s1 said:
Sure. Possible. But you're the one who claims to have a bigfoot hair, not a possible bigfoot hair. And you've made claims about their behavior that are only knowable if they exist and you've watched them extensively. So you're the one claiming absolutes, and I'm saying that claim is dishonest.


And I don't think that's a footprint at all. There's no edges on the left or bottom, no deep imprint from the heel. (where most of the weight is.) There's no arch. No imprint from the ball. The edge on the "toes" and right side are far too sharp to be from the rounded sides/toes of primate feet. There's no gaps between the toes and the big one isn't round. There's a stick near the heel that would have been pressed into the dirt but it doesn't appear to be. The left side has zero definition, if the ground was consistent, there would be an imprint there.

It does look a little like a footprint, but doesn't hold up to closer examination.
Click to expand...
 
i6s1 said:
sure. Possible. But you're the one who claims to have a bigfoot hair, not a possible bigfoot hair. And you've made claims about their behavior that are only knowable if they exist and you've watched them extensively. So you're the one claiming absolutes, and i'm saying that claim is dishonest.


and i don't think that's a footprint at all. There's no edges on the left or bottom, no deep imprint from the heel. (where most of the weight is.) there's no arch. No imprint from the ball. The edge on the "toes" and right side are far too sharp to be from the rounded sides/toes of primate feet. There's no gaps between the toes and the big one isn't round. There's a stick near the heel that would have been pressed into the dirt but it doesn't appear to be. The left side has zero definition, if the ground was consistent, there would be an imprint there.

It does look a little like a footprint, but doesn't hold up to closer examination.
Click to expand...



Laugh2 we gotz us a scientific sofa sitten pro foot print expert here, give it up man, your siv keeps on leaking faster and faster! dishwasher, opps, "dishonest" I mean, ya say, as in calling wha-wha, man-o-man, this is today, in 2015, what the hay you say! Don't ya feel like a foooo fool by now? Who r u, where r u from? I would love to know these answers! Care to tell? Kelly is busting his azz out there to come up with the answers to shut you down! Give him a fair chance to do so, aye!
 
Cleftwynd said:
I don't think anyone is holding Kelly back from either seeking proof, or sharing proof. ;)
Click to expand...

it's the weather man, dint ya see the deep snow and the twisted/tangled under brush under the hords of snow? Oh, what's that, you are willing to go on an expedition and lead the way now? Right on!;) Go-man-go! Who's holding who back? And who is stepping up to the plate, and who isn't? Right, the armchair talkers!
 
two-dogs said:
[/b]

Laugh2 we gotz us a scientific sofa sitten pro foot print expert here, give it up man, your siv keeps on leaking faster and faster! dishwasher, opps, "dishonest" I mean, ya say, as in calling wha-wha, man-o-man, this is today, in 2015, what the hay you say! Don't ya feel like a foooo fool by now? Who r u, where r u from? I would love to know these answers! Care to tell? Kelly is busting his azz out there to come up with the answers to shut you down! Give him a fair chance to do so, aye!
Click to expand...

What a thorough evisceration of my comments from CGN's resident scholar. No attempt was made to argue any point, but a series of insults, with some of them even spelled correctly, is all it takes to demonstrate my errors.

Good sir, you've proved your mental superiority and I eagerly await my next opportunity to learn from your vast knowledge.

BTW, does anyone actually think that's a footprint?
 
two-dogs said:
it's the weather man, dint ya see the deep snow and the twisted/tangled under brush under the hords of snow? Oh, what's that, you are willing to go on an expedition and lead the way now? Right on!;) Go-man-go! Who's holding who back? And who is stepping up to the plate, and who isn't? Right, the armchair talkers!
Click to expand...

Snowshoes. Or even a snowmobile. Winter is the easiest time to track anything like that, so if you're not doing it now, you're not going to do it. "Bush" is a terrible excuse. If a 10ft creature can move through that bush, it creates a path for a man to go. If they don't go through it, then there's no need to go through it to follow them. Those bushes are even denser in the summer, so if you're not able to chase squatch now, then you're never going to.

What is a good excuse is time, work, laziness, fear of cold, preference for drinking beer while watching the canucks win, etc.
 
i6s1 said:
What a thorough evisceration of my comments from CGN's resident scholar. No attempt was made to argue any point, but a series of insults, with some of them even spelled correctly, is all it takes to demonstrate my errors.

Good sir, you've proved your mental superiority and I eagerly await my next opportunity to learn from your vast knowledge.

BTW, does anyone actually think that's a footprint?
Click to expand...

yes, I know, spelling is not my strong point, good or bad, correct or incorrect, looks like toes to me, didja count them? Your welcome, I am proud and thrilled to pass on my gr-8 knowledge to a person in need, such as yourself! I hope it helps you out, greatly! Oh yeah by the way:)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom