Bill Leeper 300WSM
I finally got a chance to work up a load for my 300WSM. It’s built on a M70.
I used H4831, which I think may be just a touch too slow for this cartridge. The velocity was a little slower than what I expected it to be, but the accuracy is sure there. I was using Barnes 168 TSX bullets.
This is a load work up. It has 7 shots fired at the same target, all different powder charges. This is a quick and easy way to check for velocity, pressure and to see if your chosen load has a good chance to work properly.
This target was shot with:
65gr
66gr
67gr
67.5gr
68gr
68.5gr
69gr
All 7 shots went into a group under an inch.
Like I said, velocity was a little lower than I expected. 68.5gr was about 3000fps, and 69 gr was about 3050fps.
At 69gr, I got some pressure signs, so I stopped. Previously, I was able to get similar velocities with 180gr bullets, so that’s why I think that something a little faster may be in order. But frankly, I doubt it matters if the bullet is going 2950 or 3100 fps… :wink:
I finally got a chance to work up a load for my 300WSM. It’s built on a M70.
I used H4831, which I think may be just a touch too slow for this cartridge. The velocity was a little slower than what I expected it to be, but the accuracy is sure there. I was using Barnes 168 TSX bullets.
This is a load work up. It has 7 shots fired at the same target, all different powder charges. This is a quick and easy way to check for velocity, pressure and to see if your chosen load has a good chance to work properly.
This target was shot with:
65gr
66gr
67gr
67.5gr
68gr
68.5gr
69gr
All 7 shots went into a group under an inch.

Like I said, velocity was a little lower than I expected. 68.5gr was about 3000fps, and 69 gr was about 3050fps.
At 69gr, I got some pressure signs, so I stopped. Previously, I was able to get similar velocities with 180gr bullets, so that’s why I think that something a little faster may be in order. But frankly, I doubt it matters if the bullet is going 2950 or 3100 fps… :wink: