Bit the bullet today and ordered a bessy

Claven2

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
416   0   2
Location
Onterrible
Went with the Loyalist Arms India Pattern bess in .75/.76 cal. I was going to go military heritage because they are local, but after reading about a hundred online reviews comparing both companies on a muzzle-loading board, I decided against the MH product.

I had considered a Pedersoli, but I didn't want a Long Land type 2 clone with some historically inaccurate features that has doubled in price in less than 5 years (you'd think Pedersoli is ripping ppl off? No?) and I didn't want to buy their 2 band Bess which from what I understand is a fantasy piece that never existed in the British Army. I also really wanted the war of 1812 Era India Pattern and Pedersoli doesn't make one. Only other supplier I know of is TotW in kit form from rough castings, and frankly my skill level isn't high enough to build up a kit from rough wax castings at this time.

To summarize, what I had found out were that LA charges about $100 more, but for that you get a better finished stock, a lockwork assembed, fit and finished by LA in Halifax by Canadian gunsmiths from the Indian made parts, pre-drilled touchole, load data and a very good warranty and a parts source.

Military Heritage, while cheaper, is known for poorly hardened frizzens, poor frizzen to pan fit, rough frizzen faces, breech plugs that aren't properly slotted for the optimal touch-hole location, and a really pooor wood finish that tends to rub off easily. Nothing is fit or finished in Canada, they arrive in Toronto and Ottawa as "non-firing replicas", all assembly done in India.

Both guns are made with an Indian fruit tree hardwood generically referred to as "rosewood" that bears a close resemblance to the reddish European Walnut, but with a more open grain. Aparently though, they each use a different breed of rosewood and many buyers claim the LA musket wood is a bit harder and lighter than the MH wood. I have no idea if that's true though as I've not seen both in person. I do know that both copies are made in the same Indian city, but at different small factories. All the springs are hand-forged, which is good.

Sometime down the road if I really like the musket, maybe I'll have a walnut stock made on a duplicator. We'll see.

Another big advantage to the LA musket is that they were much more helpful on the phone and had their India Pattern on sale for March for $625 which makes it just $50 more than the MH offering - my gunsmith would have charged at least that much to pull the breech plug and drill the touchhole, dress the threads in the barrel if needed, re-harden the frizzen and fit it to the pan, smooth the trigger pull, etc. etc. True, I could have done most of it myself, but $50 is cheap for what Loyalist is offering as a service IMHO.

Of course, I'll post pics when it arrives in a couple of weeks. The store is a bit backed up from what I've been told.

This should hopefully been fun as it will be my first military smoothbore flintlock. I know alot of ppl have mixed feelings about these Indian repros, but from what I can tell, the most critical people are the folks who don't mind dropping $2000+ on a hand-made custom replica. Most folks who actualyl own the Indian guns seem to like them, but I figure I'll be able to form my own opinion soon enough. ;)
 
Congrat!
My vote went for LA as well last year ...I got the french 1690s model..no regret. LA was highly recommended by friends that did a similar research than yours. I was surprise during the Ogdensburg NY historical reenactment last summer, the gunsmith tent offered services as an official LA gunsmith...they installed a flashguard free of labour charge on my LA product!!
My only point with LA is the caliber advertised and the actual bore size...I hope they dont surprise you with an over or under size bore...too bad seemless piping does not come in .69 cal!! Cheers
 
What I have heard is that Pedersoli makes their smoothbores from inch-pattern Seamless tubing as well and that is why it is 0.750" bore. The guys at LA told me the original Besses were closer the 0.76" and that they make theirs as close as possible to this bore size.

Either way, I doubt it matters as most .75cal muzzle loaders shoot either .715 ball in paper cartridges or patched .735" round ball.

I ordered the .735" Lyman mould today and when I get around to casting up some ball, I'll just select my patch based on whatever the true bore size turns out to be when I mic it.

In a smoothbore there is no rifling to compress tha patch into, so small thinckness differences in patching mateirla can make a huge difference in how a ball fits the barrel.
 
I wish they made an adjustable round ball mold!!... I am still fiddling to find the right ball that will serve both my Charleville and French 1690s which are both rated .69 cal...but the caliper rates these bores at .68 and .67...I found a mold that spits .651...as you said the patches should make difference.
 
I think the .651 ball will fit better in the .68, but what do I know?? :) Are both your muskets from Loyalist? Which Chaleville? 1763, 1766, 1768 or 1777?
 
La

Claven2 said:
I think the .651 ball will fit better in the .68, but what do I know?? :) Are both your muskets from Loyalist? Which Chaleville? 1763, 1766, 1768 or 1777?

My French 1690s musket is from Loyalist Arms but the Charleville is from an earlier time...it is a 'made in Japan' replica sold in kit form by DixieGW..a friend of mine bult it, fire 10 rounds with it, and after a couple of years of me bugging him to buy it, he gave in (I think 1777 but not sure, see pic below)...So I am fairly new to smooth bore shooting, this year will be my big year. I had more experience with my T/C 50 cal rifle shooting...adjustable sight and all...knife and tom throwing etc...always fun these shooting events...

Let me introduce you my Charleville:
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT4972.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT4973.jpg

and in action:
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT3335.jpg
cheers
Jacques
 
Last edited:
Nice looking Charleville :) At first glance it looks like a 1766 model as used in the American Revolution (gift of France).

Do you have any pictures of your Etienne?
 
Tulle FR 1690s from LA...pic

Claven2 said:
Nice looking Charleville :) At first glance it looks like a 1766 model as used in the American Revolution (gift of France).

Do you have any pictures of your Etienne?

In fact it is a Tulle, LA repro... (1690s), bore .677 (.69 sort of!)
Here are some pictures...
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT4976.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT4977.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT4978.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT4979.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT4982.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t76/jacques1952/PICT4984.jpg

As you mentionned, the grain of this wood is a little more open than walnut.
Cheers
Jacques
 
To shoot or not to shoot...

Claven2 said:
Hey, that tulle looks great! Have you shot it yet?

When I first brought the Tulle to an event (F&I Reenactment) last summer, I ended up serving on a gun (artillery) crew...so the focus was to man the big piece...and did not even fire a blank...at an other event (shooting event), I tried the Tulle with too small ball...my T/C hawken saved the day (and my honor)...
Since then I assembled a NW trade musket kit (.62) and also got the mold for balls that should fit the Charleville and Tulle...so I am a bit scattered...lots on the go...looking forward to proof and get going with the shooting...I still have a pedersoli BB that I did not even fired yet...too many guns not enough time...
Cheers
 
Charleville model

The Charleville shown is a 1763 model - I know, I built it. After a very short time in use, the French Army decided that it was too heavy, and came out with a lighter version, the 1766. The 1777 model was still another refinement of the line. Some of the old 1763s and earlier models were sent to the American rebels to clear old stock from the French armouries, so they are good for Revwar re-enactments.

I have a 1728 Brown Bess musketoon (36-in barrel) from LA, and love it! I've shot ball and shot (skeet shooting with a musket - what a blast!). Also have a 1728 St-Etienne, but haven't fired it yet.
 
Back
Top Bottom