So if someone finds a legal animal standing on the road, while they are driving to their spot where they intend to hike/hunt, and they get out and shoot the animal, they are now just a lazy road hunter? This type of generalization and judgement is what divides us as hunters.
Case in point: On opening day of youth season, my daughters and I jumped in the truck and headed up an FSR which leads to massive areas of clear-cuts, up the side of a mountain. The plan was to spend the morning hiking, head to the truck and cook up a stew for lunch, then maybe find a spot and pop up the blind for the afternoon. 3k up the switchbacks I look up to my left and there's a buck. I ask my daughter if she wants it and she says "yes!". So I grab the shooting sticks and she grabs the .243 and I help her get set up. The buck turns broadside and she shoots it. Her first buck! We gut and skin it and get in the truck. We intend to hunt the rest of the day as planned. One more left corner, then a switchback to the right. Again, on my left up the hill a bit, a buck. Even bigger. I ask my other daughter "want him?" "YES!, this is amazing!" Repeat of last time. BANG! 2 bucks before lunch. I was disappointed that it was over so quick, but glad to have the food.
So, are you going to call my daughters lazy truck hunters, because they decided to cease the moment and legally take their bucks? If so, then go f&ck yourself
In Ontario, they wouldn't be considered lazy... They'd be considered poachers.

I'm not familiar with BC regs though. Is there no mention of road proximity?




















































