Blk Lbl a scathing review

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone looking to put a Bipod on the Tavor X95 would be well-advised to go the route of a Canadian-made RX Arms Hybrid Pistol/Cutlass Grip, combined with the FAB Defense TAR21 "Podium" spring-loaded Quick Deployment Bipod. The RX Pistol/Cutlass Grip fits all models of Tavor, including the X95 and Tavor 7. The "Podium" Bipod attaches onto the bottom of the RX Pistol/Cutlass Grip (will not fit standard X95 or Tavor 7 Grips). Just Google "RX Arms" for the applicable website. I don't believe that RX are CGN Site Sponsors, so will not direct-link to them.

20240609-163533.jpg


20240609-163703.jpg
 
Rx Arms grip is great

Does not fit Geissele trigger without modification.
But the plastic is very amenable to machining.

Bartok5 said:
Anyone looking to put a Bipod on the Tavor X95 would be well-advised to go the route of a Canadian-made RX Arms Hybrid Pistol/Cutlass Grip, combined with the FAB Defense TAR21 "Podium" spring-loaded Quick Deployment Bipod. The RX Pistol/Cutlass Grip fits all models of Tavor, including the X95 and Tavor 7. The "Podium" Bipod attaches onto the bottom of the RX Pistol/Cutlass Grip (will not fit standard X95 or Tavor 7 Grips). Just Google "RX Arms" for the applicable website. I don't believe that RX are CGN Site Sponsors, so will not direct-link to them.

20240609-163533.jpg


20240609-163703.jpg
Click to expand...
 
JDForBrkFst said:
So this company's product is trash. Here's why:

It's steel screws threaded into aluminum. What could go wrong?
Click to expand...

Tell me you don't know anything, without telling me you know anything.

You know steel bolts are holding your aluminum engine heads to your aluminum engine block and 90% of everything else fastened to your aluminum engine block.

What you wanted them to use alum or brass bolts?
 
Some people are busy and have lives. Strong words there. Painkillers. Coward? I think 2 combat tours to Afghanistan might dispute that a little.

I appreciate Blk lbl coming out and showing their results.

I was a bit strong in my initial post. I wrote it immediately after it happened and wasn't in a good mood. I should have waited and collected my thoughts.

My take on it is, the cantilever mount with the light being forward provided leverage on that point which caused the failure. There's no way there was 180 pounds on it though. So I'm still skeptical.

I've never had any other hanguard fail and have used many different ones under many circumstances. The ease which with it bent back leads me to believe something is wrong with it. Maybe it's a one off. But it failed me under circumstances I don't believe it should have.

Apologies to Blklbl for not reaching out first. I should have waited an hour or two to calm down first.
 
JDForBrkFst said:
Some people are busy and have lives. Strong words there. Painkillers. Coward? I think 2 combat tours to Afghanistan might dispute that a little.

I appreciate Blk lbl coming out and showing their results. I was a bit strong in my initial post. I wrote it immediately after it happened and wasn't in a good mood. I should have waited and collected my thoughts. Apologies to Blklbl for not reaching out first. I should have waited an hour or two to calm down first.
Click to expand...

Nothing cowardly about those words....
 
JDForBrkFst said:
Some people are busy and have lives. Strong words there. Painkillers. Coward? I think 2 combat tours to Afghanistan might dispute that a little.

I appreciate Blk lbl coming out and showing their results.
I was a bit strong in my initial post. I wrote it immediately after it happened and wasn't in a good mood. I should have waited and collected my thoughts.

My take on it is, the cantilever mount with the light being forward provided leverage on that point which caused the failure. There's no way there was 180 pounds on it though. So I'm still skeptical.

I've never had any other hanguard fail and have used many different ones under many circumstances. The ease which with it bent back leads me to believe something is wrong with it. Maybe it's a one off. But it failed me under circumstances I don't believe it should have.

Apologies to Blklbl for not reaching out first. I should have waited an hour or two to calm down first.
Click to expand...

So, more than a drop from waist height?
 
Painkillers said:
So, more than a drop from waist height?
Click to expand...

Absolutely not.

That's your takeaway from all that? Really?

I admitted I should have gone about my grievance differently and apologized to the company for that indiscretion, while still maintaining skepticism of the products durability.

Oh and the polymer cantilever mount and the cheapish polymer inforce light suffered no damage.

Care to actually address anything said or are you content to sit in the corner talking trash?

I'd bet money you wouldn't be saying any of this to my face. Typical internet troll. Get a life man.
 
JDForBrkFst said:
Absolutely not.

That's your takeaway from all that? Really?

I admitted I should have gone about my grievance differently and apologized to the company for that indiscretion, while still maintaining skepticism of the products durability.

Oh and the polymer cantilever mount and the cheapish polymer inforce light suffered no damage.

Care to actually address anything said or are you content to sit in the corner talking trash?

I'd bet money you wouldn't be saying any of this to my face. Typical internet troll. Get a life man.
Click to expand...

Careful where you lay your money guy!!!
 
JDForBrkFst said:
I moved it to the top rail of the rifle after and zero'd it. Then assessed to see if it held zero there.

Yes the handguard bent. It's advertised as "Professional grade". A drop test from waist height is well within expectations of maintaining function for "Professional grade".
Click to expand...

Verbatim. Did you suffer a head injury during your two tours?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom